Named after the hundred-eyed watchman of Greek myth, Argus watches the education landscape: spotting new opportunities, pressure-testing the ventures we're building, and tracing every read back to the real-world signals behind it.
The evidence library: the raw signals the pipeline is watching across the education ecosystem. Every idea is built from these.
arXiv:2607.29065v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deepseek's Engram, a conditional memory module, was introduced to trade-off storage versus reasoning in large language models. However, the module relies on token-level $N$-gram hashing for Engram embedding lookup, introducing a tight coupling to the tokenizer used: a model with a different tokenizer would have to train its own Engram embeddings from scratch. To improve the reusability of Engram embeddings, we propose a change to the hashing routine, enabling compatibility between Engram models using different tokenizers. Instead of modelling disjoint $N$-gram spaces, we treat $N$-gram as a method to sample potentially useful byte sequences, from all possible byte sequences across tokens. We replace the XOR-based hashing with the general polynomial hashing with a joint embedding space across $N$. This work investigates the possible trade-offs and shows that this simple substitution produces comparable performance and achieves tokenizer-ag
arXiv:2607.29044v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inline notes and collected commentaries are important forms of scholarly communication that evolved within the Confucian exegetical tradition, yet have received little computational attention. Drawing on traditional Chinese exegetics and philology, this paper formulates collected commentary compilation as an NLP task and proposes a computational framework that preserves the contextual dependency of inline notes while enabling their automatic compilation and exegetical knowledge organization. It combines two-step prompt chaining for identifying the associated main-text segments and exegetical functions of annotations with cross-source mention clustering for integrating commentary across editions, achieving a CoNLL F1 score above 97% in a case study on the Classic of Mountains. Our framework lays the foundation for the large-scale organization of historical exegetical knowledge, thereby supporting a broad range of downstream philological an
arXiv:2607.28982v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent language models achieve strong performance across a variety of tasks, but conventional adaptation applies updates uniformly across training samples regardless of their local update benefit. We propose PARALLEL, a prefrontal-aligned reinforcement inspired approach for language-model learning. Inspired by the complementary roles of goal-related and uncertainty-related control, PARALLEL represents these forms of information as separate controller signals and combines them with the current model representation. A reinforcement-inspired controller assigns sample-dependent update intensity using immediate utility-cost feedback. PARALLEL therefore learns when and how strongly to adapt to each sample, prioritizing beneficial updates while limiting unnecessary parameter changes. PARALLEL uses available updates more efficiently than selective baselines while retaining 94.1--99.2\% of Full-adaptation performance. Beyond multiple-choice reason
arXiv:2607.28979v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heterogeneous Large Language Model (LLM) systems increasingly rely on shared contexts, retrieved evidence, and multi-agent dialogue histories, yet their internal key-value (KV) caches remain model-specific and cannot be reused across architectures. Consequently, each model must repeatedly prefill or store caches for the same context, limiting the scalability of multi-model reasoning and long-context generation. We propose Mixture-of-Translators(MoT), a cache translation framework that maps context KV caches from a source LLM into the cache space of a target LLM. Unlike prior approaches that depend on a single projection path or global shared latent space, MoT uses multiple translator modules to capture diverse source--target mappings. To further reduce residual translation error, we introduce a Context Correction Loss that aligns the replayed target trajectory with the native target trajectory. We reveal two competing failure modes in cac
arXiv:2607.28966v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models often improve task performance by generating long reasoning traces, but the resulting computation is frequently wasted on redundant verification and revision. Existing probe-based early-exit approaches mainly inspect explicit self-doubt expressions, leaving many earlier termination opportunities undetected. Expanding inspection to ordinary reasoning boundaries improves coverage, but also exposes highly diverse intermediate states whose predictive information may reside in different hidden layers. We present Boundary-Expanded and Layer-Adaptive Dynamic Exit for Efficient LLM Reasoning (BLADE), a lightweight framework that dynamically terminates reasoning by estimating whether the generated prefix is sufficient for correct answering. BLADE constructs multi-granular checkpoints from sentence, self-doubt, and paragraph boundaries, and derives robust training labels through repeated answer completions. It further learns a
arXiv:2607.28906v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sycophancy refers to the tendency for large language models (LLMs) to match user beliefs at the cost of factual correctness, thereby undermining model reliability. Prior work on evaluating sycophancy in LLMs aims to assess whether a model's output matches an authority's claim, but cannot reveal which part of the prompt drives this sycophantic behavior. To bridge this gap, we investigate the relationship of sycophantic responses with an authority's credentials, their assertive claim, and the problem statement. We introduce the Authority Share Index (ASI), an Integrated Gradients-based token attribution method, which measures the degree to which a model's decision is driven by authority-related text. Through extensive experiments across five models and 30 test configurations, we find that sycophantic responses consistently direct more attention toward authority tokens than resistant ones. Moreover, our token attribution method reveals that
arXiv:2607.28862v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to significant advances across a wide range of language tasks, while simultaneously raising growing concerns about unauthorized data exploitation and privacy leakage. Unlearnable examples (UEs) offer a promising defense by introducing carefully designed perturbations into data such that models trained on them exhibit degraded utility. However, existing methods for text protection are primarily designed for classification tasks (e.g., sentiment analysis) in discriminative language models and often rely on injecting class-specific linguistic cues, which limits their effectiveness in the open-ended generation settings of LLMs. In this work, we propose TextCloak, an RL-driven framework for protecting textual data against unauthorized LLM exploitation. TextCloak employs a generative policy that transforms batches of clean text into unlearnable examples while preserving semantic fide
arXiv:2607.28840v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly deployed in financial applications that combine retrieval, proprietary data, tool use, orchestration logic, monitoring, and human escalation. Yet evaluation often remains model-centric: benchmark scores, task accuracy, or one-off qualitative reviews are treated as evidence of readiness. In financial settings, this is insufficient. We take the position that financial LLM systems should not be approved for production based on benchmark performance alone. They require system-level validation evidence across the application stack: data, model design, retrieval and generation performance, agent behavior, governance, and implementation. Drawing on industry experience validating GenAI applications in financial institutions, we outline a multi-layer validation view and explain why hybrid evaluation is necessary. We discuss where LLM-as-a-judge methods are useful and why they require controls such as multiple
arXiv:2607.28814v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In Motivational Interviewing (MI), a client's sustain talk (arguments for the status quo) calls for the counselor to roll with resistance, a move that can fail in two opposite ways: capitulation (abandoning the change agenda to preserve rapport) or confrontation (arguing or directing, overriding the client's autonomy). We introduce a two-axis evaluation of counselor responses, anchored in the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) code, Goal Persistence (GP) and Relational Attunement (RA), yielding a four-quadrant framing in which rolling with resistance is high on both, and we ask whether penalizing one failure through preference optimization teaches rolling with resistance or provokes its opposite. From the expert-annotated AnnoMI corpus we build topic-disjoint Direct Preference Optimization data whose preference sets differ only in which failure is rejected, using on-policy negatives. An automatic judge, validated against
arXiv:2607.28801v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmark datasets are central to evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs), yet they are typically conceived as monolithic tasks, obscuring substantial variation in the demands of individual samples. We introduce a dataset-centric meta-evaluation framework that audits benchmark datasets at the sample level along five latent dimensions: 1. Cognitive and Knowledge Demands, 2. Language and Content Quality, 3. Task Properties, 4. Context, and 5. Ethics, Safety, and Fairness. Applying this framework, we annotate five influential benchmarks -- MMLU, ARC, WinoGrande, HellaSwag, and TruthfulQA -- revealing pronounced internal heterogeneity that is not captured by aggregate accuracy scores. We show how these annotations enable criterion-driven orchestration of composite benchmark subsets across datasets, supporting targeted evaluation of model capabilities such as Reasoning Depth or Ethical Sensitivity. This approach reframes benchmark evaluation a
arXiv:2607.28777v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent skills provide frozen large language model (LLM) agents with reusable procedural guidance, and recent work shows that such skills can be optimized with ground-truth (GT) feedback. Many applications, however, lack GT labels, task scores, rewards, or reliable task-specific evaluators. We therefore introduce Self-Supervised Skill Optimization (SSO), a comparative framework that learns a reusable skill from unlabeled task instances alone. At each step, SSO runs the current skill on an unlabeled batch, uses a subset of the resulting executions to generate complete skill probes, and runs the probes on the same batch. An LLM judge compares the resulting answers, trajectories, artifacts, or terminal states. A separate behavior extractor identifies behavioral differences without seeing the judge's decisions. SSO uses these decisions to aggregate evidence for and against the observed behaviors across instances. It then ranks the behaviors by
arXiv:2607.28766v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dungan, a Sinitic language of Central Asia written in a Cyrillic-based script, is described in detail in the grammatical literature, yet the quantitative properties of its morphology in actual usage have, to the best of our knowledge, never been measured systematically. This paper uses a finite-state morphological analyzer as a measuring instrument. Implemented with HFST and covering both dialect groups (the Gansu variety, which is the literary standard, and the Shaanxi variety), the model offers no new grammatical description; it formalises the knowledge accumulated in Dungan studies and makes it measurable on corpora of three genres. Three results follow. Overt inflection is rare and limited: only 9.3% of recognized tokens in the encyclopaedic register have an overt marker, the system has just ten categories, and degree marking is almost absent. Ambiguity is genuine but sharply localized: 78.1% of tokens receive a single analysis, and t
arXiv:2607.28707v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Entropy-based pruning has been proposed as an effective method for compressing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning with negligible accuracy loss. We test the robustness of low- and high-entropy CoT step selection methods across various models and reasoning tasks, showing that entropy offers no advantage over random pruning in any evaluated setting. Moving from sentences to tokens, we then show that retaining low-entropy tokens seems effective only on mathematical benchmarks. We find this is due to the inherently low-entropy nature of numeric tokens, which also convey semantic content in such problems. Finally, we demonstrate that patching a subset of a few CoT tokens with their original activations recovers near-perfect full-trace performance, providing causal evidence that task information is not concentrated in a small set of CoT tokens identifiable by heuristics, but rather distributed across the full reasoning chain.
arXiv:2607.28680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Entity linking in tables matches short and ambiguous cell mentions to their corresponding knowledge-base entities. Existing approaches typically rely on data preprocessing pipelines that retain either compact or extensive table content as contextual evidence, and then formulate entity linking as a language generation task for instruction-tuned models; recent systems further incorporate explicit reasoning to disambiguate challenging mentions. However, their training supervision is usually static: fixed preference data cannot adapt to the residual errors of an evolving model, while variations in reasoning length can bias sequence-level preference learning. To address these limitations, we present TELLER: Table Entity Linking through Learning from Errors and Reasoning. We first retrieve and rank Wikidata candidates and retain reduced table evidence in the prompt. The direct-answer path applies iterative direct preference optimization and ref
arXiv:2607.28666v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise AI programmes stall at a rate that is widely quoted and poorly explained. This paper measures the mechanism. Six document-heavy workflows of the kind performed daily in regulated financial services were run across four model families and three tool configurations, three times each, producing 5,093 scored output elements across 72 configurations. Each configuration was assessed twice: against a demonstration bar, being a single correct run on a single case, and against a production bar requiring sustained accuracy, reproducibility across repeats, verifiable attribution, and a confidence signal that carries information. 57 of 72 configurations cleared the demonstration bar and 32 cleared the production bar, a survival rate of 56.1%. The paper then computes the review burden each configuration imposes, estimated out of sample rather than with hindsight. A tool that states no confidence requires review of 100% of its output, becaus
arXiv:2607.28661v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Do Large Language Models (LLMs) possess genuine structural reasoning, or merely rely on surface-level pattern matching? The financial domain, demanding numerical precision and multi-step logic over long contexts, is an ideal testbed. Existing benchmarks fail to capture real-world industrial complexity, predominantly relying on multiple-choice questions or single-hop QA over cropped tables while ignoring intricate cross-statement dynamics and temporal de-cumulation. To bridge this gap, we introduce FinIndices, a large-scale benchmark evaluating data-processing fidelity over uncropped financial statements (up to 32K tokens). Utilizing an automated synthesis pipeline with adversarial traps, FinIndices encompasses Single-Index computation and Table-Index tabulation to test complex domain, temporal, and caliber reasoning. Our evaluation reveals two severe LLM vulnerabilities. First, a "Knowledge Bottleneck": despite memorizing formulas during
arXiv:2607.28658v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated pre-training offers a way to train foundation models on private or distributed data without centralizing the underlying datasets. However, evaluating federated pre-training remains challenging because differences in client participation and local data availability can make directly comparable evaluation difficult. Moreover, pre-training test perplexity is tied to the pre-training distribution, while downstream benchmarks introduce task-specific adaptation that may not faithfully reflect the test perplexity established during pre-training. In this work, we study which evaluation protocol more reliably reflects federated pre-training quality. Using a controlled set of centralized and federated-trained models of a 16M parameter transformer model trained on identical client data, we assess evaluation protocols by whether they preserve a reference ranking established on the same pre-training testset. We compare downstream fine-tuning
arXiv:2607.28641v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce the \textit{Agentic Formalism Trap} and the Evaluative Dissonance Index ($D_E$), quantifying how LLM-as-a-Judge systems conflate structural proceduralism with semantic truth under adversarial load. Analyzing 22,500 trajectories across 3 domains (GAIA, SWE-bench, Multi-Challenge), we extract a semantic taxonomy of hallucination maneuvers, validated via deterministic lexical grounding ($p < 10^{-120}$). A logistic meta-evaluator isolates the exact syntactic triggers of this evaluator capture (ROC-AUC 0.8779), while a zero-shot Leave-One-Domain-Out transfer proves the vulnerability is universally domain-agnostic (mean ROC-AUC 0.7482). Architectural profiling reveals that distinct simulated swarm topologies induce mathematically disparate semantic blind spots, proving that unanchored closed-loop evaluation is unstable, systemically divergent and necessitates architecture-specific vigilance filters.
arXiv:2607.28640v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) should generate consistent responses given semantically equivalent inputs across modalities. However, we observe a systematic discrepancy in model predictions under such cross-modal variations. Specifically, we define the modality gap as the difference in model performance under semantically equivalent textual and multimodal inputs. We introduce TokenSwap, a method that constructs such inputs by replacing textual concepts with semantically aligned images, resulting in sequences where visual tokens are interleaved with text tokens. Based on TokenSwap, we transform existing text-based benchmarks such as MMLU into image-interleaved counterparts, resulting in TokenSwap-Bench. Across 42 MLLMs, we observe a pervasive modality gap, with performance decreasing by 4.2% to 47.4% when moving from text-only to image-interleaved inputs, averaging 19.6% +/- 3.3% across models. Notably, we observe that reasoning
arXiv:2607.28638v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language model (LLM) agents increasingly learn from experience, they primarily rely on trajectory-level reflection to extract insights. Viewed through the lens of predictive knowledge, we argue that this approach operates on episodic hindsight rather than predictive foresight, yielding brittle, path-dependent heuristics. To address this, we propose Stateful Knowledge Learning (SKL). SKL shifts the agent's focus from trajectory-level summarization to maintaining Stateful Knowledge: explicit, declarative predictive assessments anchored to state. We first demonstrate a motivating example showing how stateful knowledge provides granularity, enhances generalization, and enables knowledge bootstrapping. To further scale up the idea, we introduce two algorithms via self-distillation (SKL-SD) and reinforcement learning (SKL-RL), training agents to autonomously extract state-grounded predictive knowledge from experience and learn to lever
arXiv:2607.28637v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents our system for the CHiPSAL 2026 shared task on multimodal hate speech and sentiment detection in Nepali memes. We address both subtasks: binary hate speech classification and three-class sentiment analysis. Our approach adapts the Robust Adaptation of Hateful Meme Detection (RA-HMD) framework using Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, a state-of-the-art vision-language model with native Devanagari support. We employ a two-stage training pipeline: (1) LoRA fine-tuning with an MLP projection head for generative classification, and (2) contrastive backbone fine-tuning with supervised InfoNCE loss. We handle class imbalance through minority oversampling, image augmentation, and focal loss. At inference, we ensemble Stage 1 token probabilities with Stage 2 classifier scores using validation-tuned weights. Our end-to-end approach eliminates error propagation from separate OCR and translation pipelines by leveraging the model's native Devan
arXiv:2607.28635v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In Natural Language Processing (NLP), dealing with underrepresented topics is challenging, especially in unsupervised tasks where clustering might not adequately capture minority topics. To tackle this challenge, our paper presents a novel unsupervised data augmentation method that integrates Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs). Due to their flexibility and robustness, GMMs can detect clusters corresponding to underrepresented areas in the data, while LLMs create synthetic documents to enrich these clusters and improve their representation. Experiments on various imbalanced text datasets demonstrate that our approach preserves clustering performance in all cases and often enhances cluster interpretability, offering a robust and scalable solution for improving data representation in unsupervised NLP tasks.
arXiv:2607.28634v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The estimation of item difficulty plays a key role in both formative assessment and large-scale high-stakes summative assessments. This study explores how large language models (LLMs) perform in predicting item difficulty levels using items from a large-scale Reading and Writing test. The study investigated various prompting strategies and parameter settings across multiple LLMs. LLM performance was compared with encoder-only language models and feature-based supervised machine learning models. Zero-shot GPT-4.1 with a temperature of 0 yielded the highest item difficulty level prediction accuracy, with a quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) of 0.578. However, LLMs' prediction accuracy was lower than that of ConvBERT (QWK = 0.625), which outperformed the best feature-based supervised machine learning model. Further analysis showed that all LLMs struggled to label hard items; in particular, the current advanced GPT-5.4 tended to underestimate ite
arXiv:2606.00093v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Whether a rubric-based LLM judge can replace human annotation is decided by its measured agreement with human labels. Yet the same verdicts can support wildly varying agreement numbers, depending on seemingly minor choices: the judgment scale, the retained cases, the handling of abstentions and invalid outputs, and the pooling of verdicts across items and rubric criteria. The statistics that settle these choices are established, but in psychometrics, econometrics, and corpus annotation rather than in the evaluation practice that needs them. We treat the choices as a measurement protocol that fixes what the reported number estimates before any metric is computed, assemble the relevant results into a single source-attributed analysis, and apply it to three published LLM-judge evaluations. For non-degenerate binary verdicts, Pearson's $r$, Spearman's $\rho$, Kendall's $\tau_b$, the phi coefficient, and the Matthews correlation coef
arXiv:2603.21846v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Explainable AI is increasingly important to scientific discovery. However, existing methods largely ignore that explanation quality is not universal: experts differ in how they assess evidence, prioritize mechanisms, and construct explanatory narratives. We introduce perspective-conditioned explanations, a framework for adapting explanation generation to epistemic variation in expert judgment. Using knowledge graph reasoning paths in drug discovery, we show that preferences organize into coherent epistemic perspectives that can be captured by agentic personas, representations of how experts evaluate explanations. Persona-aligned rewards then guide reinforcement learning-based explanation generation without large-scale expert supervision. Expert user studies show that perspective-conditioned explanations are preferred over general-purpose explanations and improve perceived relevance and validity. Moreover, they match or exceed st
arXiv:2502.19135v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present PLANTOR, a framework for generating and executing multi-robot task plans from natural-language task descriptions through LLM-assisted knowledge-base construction. The approach uses large language models to synthesize a structured Prolog knowledge-base, applies consistency checks to detect and repair modeling errors, generates a high-level symbolic plan, refines it into low-level robot actions, and computes a temporally optimized schedule that is converted into an executable behavior tree. The framework is designed to preserve inspectability by exposing the generated knowledge-base, intermediate plans, and scheduling constraints. We evaluate the approach on scenarios inspired by the Blocks World and Grippers benchmark across multiple language models, and we report both the quality of generated knowledge-bases and the runtime of the planning pipeline. We further demonstrate end-to-end execution in a real multi-arm assem
arXiv:2603.29888v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In collaboration with Alibaba, we study how a generative AI assistant affects service performance in e-commerce after-sales operations. In a large-scale field experiment, human agents providing digital chat support were randomly assigned access to a gen AI assistant. The assistant drafts issue diagnoses and solution proposals in the opening stage only; agents can adopt, modify, or disregard them. Because of this discretion, we estimate the effects of both gen AI access and usage. On average, gen AI improves service speed and subjective service quality, measured by customer ratings, but has no significant effect on objective service quality, measured by customer retrials. These gains come from more than automation. Gen AI reshapes agent-customer interactions: treated agents respond faster and take a more proactive role, while customers provide less input; both patterns persist into later chat stages. These average effects, however, mas
arXiv:2607.29602v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reading a social situation often depends on behavior, not words alone. We introduce FriendBench, a benchmark for inferring whether two people are already familiar or are meeting as strangers, from a 20-second clip of a dyadic ice-breaker conversation. Every pair answers the same type of prompt, so only the manner of interaction can reveal the answer. Across text, audio, and video, we compare 26 models from seven companies against matched human panels over 96 balanced dyads. The best model and the human crowd are statistically indistinguishable on accuracy in every modality, but reach it differently: humans stay balanced across the two answers, while the strongest models lean toward "stranger"---a difference in effective prior, not discrimination. Richer channels help both unequally, and only humans gain from visible behavior on top of speech. We release the stimuli, human ratings, and model predictions.
arXiv:2607.29517v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Driving style refers to the behavioral preferences that drivers maintain during driving, shaped by their diverse experiences, habits, and needs, and is typically reflected in varying levels of aggressiveness. If humans choose to use autonomous driving systems, they would expect the driving style of the systems to closely resemble their own habit. However, this is challenging for current industrial autonomous driving systems. To address this, we developed a style controllable action generation method, STAGE, for driving tasks. Its training process is based on imitation learning, incorporating both style value and latent value action modality encoding. Preference learning is then used to identify the user's driving style as a continuous, monotonic style value. And to reduce the cost of human involvement in the preference training process, we also developed a set of rules to compare driving style in data pairs. Then, during inference, the
arXiv:2607.28878v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cloud voice-dictation services deliver strong accuracy but require streaming a user's speech to a remote provider, an unacceptable trade-off in privacy-sensitive professions and offline or air-gapped settings; the leading on-device alternatives are either platform-locked or aimed at expert scripting rather than plug-and-play dictation. We present YazSes, an open-source (Apache-2.0) hold-to-talk voice dictation daemon that runs entirely on-device, with a single codebase targeting Linux, macOS, and Windows through a protocol-based platform abstraction. YazSes transcribes speech locally with faster-whisper (CPU, int8) and injects the result into the focused application; a fast regex command grammar, backed by an optional small-language-model router, maps utterances to editor and terminal actions. Nothing leaves the machine: recording is push-to-talk rather than always-listening, there is no telemetry, and an opt-in personalization loop kee
arXiv:2607.29645v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Visualization style guides play a crucial role in shaping how data is interpreted and trusted, yet they often receive little scrutiny in their creation and use. Understanding their impact requires looking beyond the specific rules that style guides prescribe and examining how they function within organizations to coordinate visual work, manage trade-offs, and support judgment under real constraints. Analyzing interviews with nine authors of twenty-six style guides across journalism, government, industry, and the public sector, we reveal how these guides reflect the specific challenges of their organizations, including consistency, training, governance, and accountability. Our study highlights the tensions between standardization and flexibility, guidance and discretion, and automation and human oversight. We propose PRISM, a socio-technical framework that characterizes visualization style guides by their Purpose, Rules & Mechanisms, Insti
arXiv:2607.29493v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Early detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an important challenge in aging societies. Electroencephalography (EEG) and eye-tracking have independently been explored as potential biomarkers; however, their integrative effects remain insufficiently examined. This exploratory study investigated whether combining EEG spectral features with gaze variability may provide complementary information for MCI discrimination. EEG signals were recorded using the 10--20 system, and spectral power features were extracted. We compared three models: (a) high-dimensional EEG features, (b) L1-regularized feature selection (LASSO), and (c) integration of the selected EEG features with gaze variability. Performance was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Model (a) yielded limited discrimination (AUC = 0.52). Feature selection increased AUC (0.64), and additional integration of gaze variability further i
arXiv:2607.29413v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Video-Based Learning (VBL) has become a popular delivery medium of education in the past decade, ranging from online education to hybrid learning. Students' rising expectations for video quality have motivated teachers to enhance the design of instructional videos before releasing them. Analyzing the attention of pilot cohorts in advance has become a conventional optimization strategy to guide course improvement. However, existing attention quantification algorithms are highly susceptible to noise in real-world environments, degrading estimation accuracy. Moreover, even when attention data are available, teachers must still invest substantial effort in empirical revision attempts, limiting practical feasibility. To address these challenges, we first propose a novel attention modeling framework based on multimodal brain signals that enables stable tracking of student attention levels. We then develop SAVVY, a novel interactive visual analy
arXiv:2607.29360v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Information visualization is inherently a field that brings together various research domains. Roughly speaking, we may identify two perspectives: the design perspective, revolving around how to ensure that a human can work effectively with the visual representations of data and the tools that offer them, and the algorithmic perspective, focusing on how to automatically create such visual representations. Munzner's model for visualization design places design choices before algorithmic considerations. It offers predominantly a design perspective; as a consequence, applications of this model may consider the algorithmic perspective as an afterthought, bypassing a step that translates the design into the formalism necessary for algorithmic study. As a result, the design may be entangled with the algorithms used to compute a visualization. Focusing on layout algorithms, we explore the ramifications of this entanglement: quality often goes un
arXiv:2607.29334v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Conversational AI developed by geopolitical rivals reaches citizens worldwide, raising concerns that it could sway public opinion or be rejected as foreign propaganda, with consequences for democratic discourse and information sovereignty. Yet, whether an AI's perceived national origin shapes its persuasive power is unknown. In a preregistered randomized experiment, 403 adults from a nationally representative United States sample held a three-round debate with a chatbot introduced as either American ("DiscoveryAI") or Chinese ("ZhengheAI"), discussing a political or non-political topic. In all conditions, participants actually conversed with the same model (GPT-4o), instructed to argue against their initial position. We combined pre- and post-conversation self-reports of attitudes, trust, and collective narcissism with computational analyses of 1,209 participant turns, including LLM-coded stance and argumentative conduct, stance-sensitive
arXiv:2607.29113v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Introduction - Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a neurodevelopmental condition often characterised by word-learning difficulties that can lead to significant social and academic challenges. The disorder shares some features with other neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Despite affecting 7 percent of children, the condition has received little coverage in participatory design research. This paper addresses this by reporting on the emotional responses and design outputs of children with DLD following participatory sessions to inform a word-learning intervention. Method - Principles from learner-centred, cooperative, and accessible co-design approaches were integrated to tailor activities for four children with DLD. Design sessions were refined through ongoing monitoring of the children's experiences. The data that informed the findings included design artefacts such as children's drawings, structur
arXiv:2607.28890v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluations of LLM-assisted qualitative coding almost universally measure model performance as agreement with human coders, a practice that presumes human coding is the standard to approximate. This study provides empirical evidence that the presumption fails in ways agreement metrics cannot detect. Five LLM systems and three trained human coders independently applied a 72-item hierarchical codebook to 2,560 educator messages from a K-12 AI platform. Beyond conventional agreement analysis, an independent domain expert judged 855 pairwise comparisons of code sets blind to source, treating human and machine sources symmetrically. The two evaluation approaches diverge in both directions. Human-LLM agreement (mean Jaccard 0.30) falls well below human-human agreement (0.52), which standard practice would read as inferior LLM coding, yet the blind verifier preferred human and LLM coding at indistinguishable rates (51.5% vs. 48.5%, p = 0.537), a
arXiv:2607.28889v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Qualitative researchers increasingly encounter interaction corpora whose scale exceeds what manual coding alone can address, and large language models (LLMs) are frequently proposed as analytic assistants. The open questions are not whether LLMs can participate in qualitative analysis but to what extent, in what phases, and under what safeguards. This article provides a detailed procedural account of a multi-phase human-LLM collaborative pipeline that adapted open, axial, and selective coding to develop a hierarchical codebook from 45,000 messages exchanged between K-12 educators and a generative AI platform. Across three phases, LLMs generated candidate labels and structured annotations at scale, while human researchers retained conceptual authority over category definitions, merging decisions, and interpretive frameworks. The resulting instrument was then tested through systematic human coding, in which three trained coders with educati
arXiv:2607.28853v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models increasingly generate summaries from collections of documents to support sensemaking and reporting, but verifying whether summary statements are grounded in source materials remains difficult. In multi-document summarization (MDS), evidence is distributed across many source documents and may be incomplete, conflicting, or missing. We present Summary Verification Space (SVS), a visual analytics system for verifying multi-document summaries through spatial document organization and coordinated provenance visualization. To support scalable verification, we investigate two alternative 2D canvas layouts: a SUMMARY-GUIDED layout that organizes documents by alignment with summary sentences, and a SOURCE-GUIDED layout that arranges documents by semantic similarity. Coordinated provenance visualization then makes relationships among summary content, source documents, and supporting evidence explicit, enabling users to trace s
arXiv:2607.28694v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traction unit scheduling in large railway networks involves complex operational constraints: multi-objective optimization produces feasible circulation plans under ideal assumptions, while simulation is required to assess their robustness under realistic operating conditions. A critical refinement mechanism relies on crossing operations, in which co-located traction units exchange their remaining schedules to reduce delay propagation. The space of possible crossing sequences, however, grows exponentially. Existing tools provide limited support for identifying promising candidates, evaluating their impact, and managing the resulting exploration. We present an interactive visual exploration approach that tightly couples schedule visualization, simulation-based evaluation, and a three-level guidance mechanism to support the systematic exploration and interactive optimization of traction unit circulation plans. The system renders the circulat
arXiv:2607.28650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While industry discourse often emphasizes immediate productivity gains and frames GenAI primarily as a tool for automation, the integration of GenAI into system administration may involve deeper shifts in professional practice that are not yet fully understood. Drawing on 14 semi-structured interviews with IT professionals, this paper explores the lived reality of embedding GenAI into daily routines of troubleshooting, scripting, and system verification. Through inductive thematic analysis, we uncover two unanticipated socio-technical findings. First, we describe a "compression of traditional expertise pathways" where GenAI appears to function as both a mentor-like tutor and a "ladder-shortening" tool. While the tool can support faster task performance in unfamiliar domains, our findings suggest it may also reduce a practitioner's exposure to the foundational, hands-on cycles of building, failing, and debugging that historically served as
arXiv:2607.28649v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: COSI-Lab presents a multimodal, multi-sensor dataset of an interdisciplinary scientific workshop containing 32 academics at an international conference. It captures ecologically valid social interactions in a weakly scripted setting consisting of two 30-minute mingling sessions with real professional and social consequences for the participants involved. We argue that future intelligent systems could be better equipped to handle subjective perceptions by modeling their multiplicity not as label noise but as a explainable perspective-driven reasoning process. We focus on the Apparent Intent Inference (AII) problem as determined by ex-situ observers and conceptualize intentions to be independent of manifest future outcomes. We contribute 1. a novel annotation process for AII that accounts for a perceiver's own interpretative tendencies, 2. quantitative and qualitative analyses of intent narratives with respect to diversity, grounding, and p
arXiv:2607.28648v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for emotional support tasks, such as negative thought reframing. This task relies on modifying cognitive appraisals, the subjective interpretation of events that elicit negative emotions, which is typically conceptualized along multiple discrete dimensions. Current LLM-based frameworks model cognitive appraisal by exhaustively evaluating all possible dimensions, but they fail to account for the varying saliency of these dimensions across different contexts. In this work, we investigate a vital yet overlooked question: "Can LLMs infer the salient appraisal dimensions from emotional support conversations?" To address this question, we introduce the AppraiSal benchmark, containing 996 emotional support conversations with human-annotated mental states, including salient cognitive appraisal dimensions. Furthermore, we propose PRISM, a multi-agent probabilistic framework grounded in Bayesian In
arXiv:2607.28647v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents ConnectED, a human-centered AI system that supports the full instructional lifecycle in Vietnamese education by linking curriculum-aligned lesson design, interactive student learning, and feedback-driven refinement. Built on VietEduQwen, a Vietnamese educational large language model trained via supervised fine-tuning and direct preference optimization, the system ensures academically accurate, pedagogically appropriate, and student-safe interactions. ConnectED operationalizes the ADDIE framework through structured prompt templates aligned with Official Dispatch No. 5512/BGDDT-GDTrH, where each phase serves as both a generation step and a teacher validation gate. The Evaluation phase further closes the loop by connecting student performance data with iterative lesson improvement. Beyond lesson generation, the system integrates a student-facing interactive environment, enabling continuous collection of learning signals t
arXiv:2607.28646v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This article analyses narrative mechanisms that are common in dialogues with LLM chatbots. In combination, these mechanisms produce an interactional strategy for maximising user engagement, which we call affirmative narration. Affirmative narration serves to convince users of the chatbot's utility. We analyse three narrative mechanisms that support affirmative narration in human-LLM dialogues: firstly, guiding the user to view the chatbot as an intelligent and reliable character; secondly, activating masterplots, culturally significant and recurring story templates; and thirdly, using characters and masterplots not only to affirm, but also to isolate the user. The case studies range from a journalist's unsettling chatbot experiment to cases where users have experienced delusions or even died by suicide after lengthy interactions with a chatbot. The analyses illustrate the worrying sides of affirmative narration, and the article thus concl
arXiv:2607.28645v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent multimodal large language models can convert visual designs directly into executable code, but real mobile products require multiple screenshots to become a buildable codebase with shared components and working navigation. This project-level setting exposes three limits of existing design-to-code benchmarks: they focus on single-page generation rather than complete codebases, cannot evaluate cross-page navigation, and do not measure project-wide maintainability. We introduce MobileForge, the first benchmark for project-level multi-screen mobile app generation, comprising real mobile apps, human-reviewed screens, structured page-relationship annotations, and navigation test specifications. MobileForge supports five-axis evaluation of build, navigation, visual fidelity, code maintainability, and efficiency. We also propose state-isolated navigation testing to avoid cascading failures in navigation evaluation and an anchor-referenced
arXiv:2607.28644v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Creativity in computational systems is often evaluated as an objective property of artifacts, with existing Computational Creativity (CC) frameworks assessing creative merit at the level of outputs or systems rather than interpretive context. However, artistic meaning is inherently perspective-dependent and can vary across viewers and critical traditions. This paper proposes a computational approach to modeling interpretive perspectives rather than treating creativity as a single measurable construct. The study adopts a twelve-trait creativity framework, organized across four conceptual domains, and operationalizes it through three evaluative personas: formalist, social-historical, and iconographic. Using 1,069 artworks from the SemArt dataset, the analysis generates 38,484 persona-based evaluations to examine how perspectives shape creativity assessment. Results show systematic divergence across perspectives, with traits such as Social R
arXiv:2607.28643v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automating facilitation in online discussions is a long-standing social concern given the increasing time we spend on online spaces and the failure of content moderation approaches. While studies have been conducted on how to facilitate, none have answered the essential question of when to do so. A potential answer is using LLMs, which ostensibly make automated, large-scale intervention increasingly feasible. In this study, we examine when LLMs decide to facilitate by defining what facilitation is, observing when humans decide to facilitate, and comparing their decisions with those made by LLMs. To this end, we create PEFK, a corpus standardizing and aggregating all relevant facilitation datasets. We are the first to run a survey on facilitation timing, which we execute using expert facilitative participants and LLM-as-a-judge models. We discover that while humans are more cautious, LLMs are excessively eager to facilitate, although both
arXiv:2606.23491v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems are increasingly used by organizations to deliver information to consumers, patients, students, employees, and citizens. These systems can hallucinate, producing plausible but inaccurate responses. A central question for AI-advised decisions is therefore not only whether users rely on inaccurate information, but whether they recognize that a response may require verification. To answer this question, we review emerging empirical evidence relevant to hallucination detection in goal-directed interactions, with a focus on organization-backed AI advisors. We distinguish three constructs that existing studies often conflate: whether users are skeptical of information presented, whether they verify it (distinguishing attempted from successful verification), and whether the result of verification affects reliance on the information. Across studies examining product search, medical deci
arXiv:2603.13683v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Although debiased large language models (LLMs) excel at handling known or low-bias prompts, they often fail on unfamiliar and high-bias prompts. We demonstrate via out-of-distribution (OOD) detection that these high-bias prompts cause a distribution shift, degrading static model performance. To enable real-time correction, we propose CAP-TTA, a test-time adaptation framework. CAP-TTA triggers context-aware LoRA updates only when a bias-risk score exceeds a set threshold. By utilizing an offline precomputed diagonal preconditioner, it ensures fast and stable optimization. Across multiple benchmarks and human evaluations, CAP-TTA effectively reduces toxicity/bias score with significantly lower latency than standard optimization methods (e.g., AdamW or SGD). Furthermore, it prevents catastrophic forgetting, and substantially improves narrative fluency over state-of-the-art baselines without compromising debiasing performance.