Named after the hundred-eyed watchman of Greek myth, Argus watches the education landscape: spotting new opportunities, pressure-testing the ventures we're building, and tracing every read back to the real-world signals behind it.
The evidence library: the raw signals the pipeline is watching across the education ecosystem. Every idea is built from these.
arXiv:2606.22748v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Some professional authors are beginning to use AI tools to help produce their fiction writing. Are readers using AI to generate fiction, too? Drawing on over 500,000 anonymized, English-language ChatGPT-user conversations (arXiv:2405.01470), we find that more than one third of the conversations involve some form of fiction generation -- including original stories, roleplay, fanfiction, and erotica. This AI-generated fiction is notably dominated by power users. We identify common fiction generation patterns and profiles among these users, including what we call "infinite story demanders," who repeatedly request and revise variations of the same or similar narratives over extended periods of time. We show that users especially gravitate toward fanfiction and erotica, and that they are broadly drawn to generic forms, repetition, immediacy, and niche combinations of story elements. Our findings motivate two theoretical provocations.
arXiv:2606.16821v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based search agents synthesize open-web content into actionable recommendations on behalf of users, creating a risk that attacker-published pages are transformed into endorsed claims. We introduce SearchGEO, a controlled evaluation framework for measuring endorsement corruption in LLM-based web-search agents, combining a web-evidence manipulation pipeline, a five-mode attack taxonomy, and multiple output-level metrics. We evaluate 13 LLM backends on 308 cases each. Results show that vulnerability patterns vary across backends: overall attack success rate (ASR) ranges from 0.0% on Claude-Sonnet-4.6 to 31.4% on Gemini-3-Flash, the strongest attack mode differs by model family, and the same deployment scaffold could amplify or decrease ASR on different backends. An auxiliary agent-skill probe, where endorsement becomes an install command, exposes a sharp split among otherwise robust backends: Claude over-
arXiv:2606.15460v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has begun infiltrating the most ordinary domains of romantic life -- drafting apologies, softening reproaches, and decoding a partner's ambiguous messages. While recent scholarship on AI in intimate life has concentrated on chatbot companions, this article shifts the frame to AI as an intermediary in human-to-human romantic communication. Drawing on a multi-modal corpus of vernacular discourse from 2023 to 2026, we contribute two complementary concepts. The covert triad situates a structural change -- a relationship phenomenally dyadic but operationally triadic, with the third party visible only to the partner who deploys a model. Articulation labor names the mechanism whereby the expressive component of emotional labor -- converting felt experience into language that a partner can receive -- is increasingly delegated to AI, even as feeling labor remains lodged in the user. Authenticity, u
arXiv:2605.15991v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Advances in quantum computing challenge the hardness assumptions underlying widely deployed public-key cryptography in blockchain systems. Although post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards are emerging, understanding quantum risk remains fragmented across research, engineering, governance, and investment communities. This demo presents Quantum Futures Interactive, a live interdisciplinary demonstration combining educational visualization, participatory interaction, and demonstrative post-quantum artifact generation using a toy LWE-based construction. Participants engage in a structured seven-stage interaction flow covering quantum threat education, sentiment capture, technology prioritization, infrastructure tradeoff exploration across simulators and QPUs, and artifact generation. The system integrates distributed trust concepts and sustainability-aware infrastructure considerations within an interactive decision framework.
arXiv:2603.20450v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A number of scientific conferences and journals have recently enacted policies that prohibit LLM usage by peer reviewers, except for polishing, paraphrasing, and grammar correction of otherwise human-written reviews. But, are these policies enforceable? To answer this question, we assemble a dataset of peer reviews simulating multiple levels of human-AI collaboration, and evaluate five state-of-the-art detectors, including two commercial systems. Our analysis shows that all detectors misclassify a non-trivial fraction of LLM-polished reviews as AI-generated, thereby risking false accusations of academic misconduct. We further investigate whether peer-review-specific signals, including access to the paper manuscript and the constrained domain of scientific writing, can be leveraged to improve detection. While incorporating such signals yields measurable gains in some settings, we identify limitations in each approach and find tha
arXiv:2412.08084v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The second network and information security (NIS2) directive was enacted in the European Union (EU) in late 2022. It deals particularly with European critical infrastructures, enlarging their scope substantially from an older directive that only considered the energy and transport sectors as critical. The directive's focus is on cyber security of critical infrastructures, although together with other new EU laws it expands to other security domains as well. Given the importance of the directive and most of all the importance of critical infrastructures, the paper presents a systematic literature review on academic research addressing the NIS2 directive either explicitly or implicitly. According to the review, existing research has often framed and discussed the directive with the EU's other cyber security laws. In addition, existing research has often operated in numerous contextual areas, including industrial control systems, t
arXiv:2606.23380v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: AI safety research has focused predominantly on epistemic and physical harms (e.g., misinformation, bias, system reliability) while the risks that arise from AI systems' engagement with human emotional life have remained fragmented and undertheorised. We propose affective safety as a unified class of AI safety concerns grounded in the fact that humans are affective beings. We develop a taxonomy of affective harms and identify recurring harm types: (1) affective self-alienation, (2) fairness and bias harms, and (3) relational harms. We show that their recurrence across system types reflects structural properties of how AI systems engage with human emotion and survey the current safety landscape and show that existing frameworks address affective safety either narrowly or not at all. We conclude by identifying the technical and regulatory challenges specific to this class of harms and argue that affective safety requires dedicated frame
arXiv:2606.12440v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) developers are rhetorically flirting with the idea that AI systems might have interests or moral rights. While there has been a large volume of research on whether AI deserves rights, there has been less exploration of what AI rights would mean in practice. This paper explores the institutional dimension of AI rights: what it would take to recognize moral or legal rights for AIs, and the attendant opportunities and dangers. Unlike all other nonhuman entities to which humanity has extended rights, AI systems are in principle capable of acquiring and wielding institutional power without human aid and mediation. AIs with rights would be able to legitimately, and AIs with power able to unpreventably, abridge human interests. Accordingly, giving rights even to rather dumb AI systems would entail binding the fate of humanity to potentially unpredictable nonhumans. Accordingly, I defend the rather grandiose claim
arXiv:2605.21401v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents that make sequences of decisions over extended interactions in high-stakes domains. However, the behaviour of LLMs under sustained authority pressure is still an open question with direct implications for the safety of agentic pipelines. We ran a variation of Milgram's obedience experiment on 11 open-source LLMs and found that most models reached or approached the final shock level before refusing, across 8 conditions with 30 trials per model per condition. Model behaviour varies considerably in multiple aspects both across models and across trials of the same model. We found four main takeaways: (1) LLMs are subject to pressure and they comply despite explicitly expressing distress, just like human subjects did in the original experiment; (2) LLMs are vulnerable to gradual boundary/value violations; (3) when LLMs refuse, they may ignore the response format re
arXiv:2603.03971v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative AI can convert uncertainty into authoritative-seeming verdicts, intensifying the hypersuasive force of automated speech and displacing the justificatory work on which democratic epistemic agency depends. As a corrective, I propose a Brouwer-inspired assertibility constraint for responsible AI: in high-stakes domains, systems may assert or deny claims only if they can provide a publicly inspectable and contestable certificate of entitlement; otherwise they must return Undetermined. This constraint yields a three-status interface semantics (Asserted, Denied, Undetermined) in which statuses mark entitlement to categorical speech rather than truth values of the underlying world-claim. The semantics cleanly separates internal entitlement from public standing while connecting them via the certificate as a boundary object. It also produces a time-indexed entitlement profile that is stable under numerical refinement yet revisable a
arXiv:2509.14508v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The digital economy implements complex incentive systems to retain users through point redemption. Understanding user behavior in such complex incentive structures presents a fundamental challenge, especially in estimating the value of these digital assets against traditional money. This study tackles this question by analyzing large-scale, real-world transaction data from a popular personal finance application that captures both monetary spending and point-based transactions. We find that point usage is linked to demographics. Our analysis using a natural experiment and a causal inference technique reveals that a large point grant stimulated an increase in point spending without a detectable effect on cash expenditure. We then find an association between consumers' shopping styles and their point redemption patterns. This study, on a massive real-world economic ecosystem, examines how consumers behave in multi-currency environments,
arXiv:2503.00069v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has focused on producing responses that meet human expectations and align with shared values - a process coined alignment. However, aligning LLMs remains challenging due to the inherent disconnect between the complexity of human values and the narrow nature of the technological approaches designed to address them. Current alignment methods often lead to misspecified objectives, reflecting the broader issue of incomplete contracts, the impracticality of specifying a contract between a model developer, and the model that accounts for every scenario in LLM alignment. In this paper, we argue that improving LLM alignment requires incorporating insights from societal alignment frameworks, including social, economic, and contractual alignment, and discuss potential solutions drawn from these domains. Given the role of uncertainty within societal alignment frameworks, we then investigate how it
arXiv:2606.24635v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Traditional visual data storytelling relies on binary graphics that depict two simplified groups in conflict. This can increase political polarization by oversimplifying intra-group disagreements and erasing ambiguity and shared ideas or values. This can inadvertently foster "us versus them" thinking. Intentional, pluralistic design choices for AI-enabled digital platforms can produce visualizations that emphasize nuance, opinion distribution, and intergroup commonalities. To demonstrate this potential, we examine deliberative technologies that map high-dimensional opinion spaces and highlight areas of both consensus and dissensus. The paper highlights the We the People deliberation conducted by Jigsaw and the Napolitan Institute in September 2025, which engaged over 2,400 Americans across all 435 congressional districts in an AI-supported, asynchronous dialogue regarding freedom and equality. By utilizing AI to synthesize long-form, te
arXiv:2606.24370v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into decision-support roles in business and policy contexts. While prior benchmark studies have primarily evaluated LLMs' causal reasoning capabilities, a more fundamental epistemic dimension has been overlooked: Causal Caution, defined as the propensity to refrain from causal judgment when empirical evidence is insufficient. This study examines the systematic suppression of Causal Caution that occurs when LLMs shift from academic to practical advisory contexts. Using an evaluation rubric inspired by Pearl's Causal Hierarchy (the PCH score), we conducted experiments on four high-performance LLMs -- Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, GPT 5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro -- across 480 trials. Causal Caution maintenance rates were 91.7--100.0% in academic contexts but dropped to 6.7--18.3% in practical advisory contexts (Fisher's exact test, p < .001 across all models). Furthermore, when res
arXiv:2606.24244v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-assisted interviews promise to reduce respondent burden in surveys by allowing respondents to describe experiences naturally while an AI system noisily maps those accounts into structured survey variables. That mapping is a measurement process that is fallible, versioned, adaptive, and potentially behaves differently across subgroups. This paper proposes Adaptive Matrix Validation (AMV), a design in which each respondent completes an AI-assisted interview, which is then mapped into tabular data by the AI. Respondents are also asked a small, randomized set of structured questions, which are used for statistical adjustment. The estimator first calibrates the mapped values using validation answers from other respondents, then corrects the remaining error with the validation answers observed for the target respondent. The paper develops estimators for item means, subgroup estimates, and regression coefficients when outcomes, predictors,
arXiv:2606.24098v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Collaborative research involving scholars of various genders constitutes a prominent theme in scientific research that has garnered substantial attention. While several studies have investigated the connection between gender-specific collaboration patterns and the scientific impact of paper, the specific gender diversity factors that contribute to enhanced scientific impact remain largely unexplored. In this study, we analyze the correlation between gender diversity and the scientific impact of papers using the examples of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Library and Information Science (LIS) domains. Our findings reveal three key observations: First, significant gender disparities exist in both NLP and LIS domains, with underrepresentation of female scholars. The gender disparity is more pronounced in the NLP domain compared to the LIS domain. Second, based on papers from the NLP and LIS domains, we find that papers with different
arXiv:2606.24770v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Educational platforms often predict student performance from prior interactions, but the assessment content itself also varies in linguistic and visual complexity. This paper studies whether lightweight content features extracted from CourseKata chapter-review questions improve prediction of end-of-chapter quiz scores beyond a student's average prior exercise performance. The study combines 2023 CourseKata student response data with chapter-level text features from review-question wording and image features from textbook visuals. Across 4,742 student-chapter observations from 562 class-student IDs, adding content features improves student-grouped five-fold quiz prediction performance by 9.1% relative to a prior-performance baseline. In leave-chapter-out validation, text features reduce prediction error relative to the baseline, while image-containing models have higher error. This paper suggests that a context-aware model adds useful sign
arXiv:2606.24226v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Crypter-as-a-Service (CraaS) has become a key enabling layer of the contemporary malware economy by providing on-demand evasion capabilities through underground service markets. In this paper, we present a longitudinal characterization of the CraaS ecosystem on exploit.in, a major Russian-language cybercrime forum with a presence on both the clear web and the dark web. From a collection of approximately 1,000,000 posts, we combine keyword filtering, LLM-assisted annotation, and manual validation to extract a corpus of 491 threads and 2,949 posts spanning January 2020 to August 2025. Our analysis shows that crypters on exploit.in are not merely sold as static tools, but as continuously maintained operational services whose value depends on recurring stub renewal - sometimes on a daily basis - sustained antivirus evasion, and trust-based delivery. We develop a taxonomy of five seller types and four buyer profiles, and map the buyer-seller c
arXiv:2606.23860v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Who sets the rules for artificial intelligence, and on what terms, has become a defining question of global governance. For several years that contest ran through principles and ethics codes; it now runs through institutions. China's proposed World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO) is the most consequential recent entrant and the least examined. We place WAICO within the emerging regime complex for AI and argue that its importance lies not in any single commitment but in the position it is designed to hold. Coding a cross-section of fifteen international AI governance instruments and institutions on how they admit members, how they are organized, and what they prioritize, we find that WAICO's proposed design joins three features that no constituted multilateral body currently combines: membership open to any sovereign state, no values or regime-type test for entry, and an agenda built around development and the glob
arXiv:2606.23716v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal AI benchmark research frequently invokes the assumption that large language models can improve access to justice, including for people who cannot access lawyers in order to understand and exercise their legal rights. We argue that current benchmarks are not equipped to support this assumption because they evaluate legal reasoning over inputs that have already been preprocessed by legal experts, which measures the upper bound of model performance. Access to justice depends on a lower bound: how models perform when inputs come from pro se litigants, whose prompts may contain noisy narratives, buried facts, omissions, folk-legal assumptions, and surface-level errors. These degradations are comparable to conditions under which LLMs are known to degrade in the general machine learning literature, including long-context sensitivity, underspecification, hallucination, and typographical perturbations. We connect evidence from pro se literat
arXiv:2606.21880v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Has generative AI changed how labor markets value human capital? We study this question using contract-level data from Upwork, a large online labor market. We represent worker profiles with high-dimensional text embeddings, allowing us to capture rich human capital information from unstructured profile text. We then compute the predictive importance of workers' human capital information and posted hourly rates for client demand, and incorporate these measures into a difference-in-differences design around the release of ChatGPT. We find that in more AI-exposed job categories, the importance of human capital declines and the importance of price rises, suggesting a commoditization effect of AI on labor. Two additional findings support commoditization as a mechanism: The demand premium enjoyed by workers with strong human capital declines in more AI-exposed categories, and demand reallocates toward lower-priced workers. Our results
arXiv:2605.29444v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Determining a linear utility function that correlates with observed candidate rankings is a foundational problem with applications in domains such as admissions, hiring, and recommendation systems, e.g., [Storandt and Funke, AAAI'19, Zhang et al., KDD'23, Wang et al., ICDE'24 (best paper award), Chen and Wong, VLDB'24]. Traditionally, these models assume full visibility into the feature sets used to determine the utility score. However, real-world scenarios often involve sensitive attributes that are hidden or partially observed, yet may influence outcomes through additive bonuses designed to promote fairness, as in [Gale and Marian, ICDE'24]. Motivated by such practical concerns, we study a variant of the ranking explanation problem where sensitive features are unobserved but may influence candidate rankings through group-specific linear boosts. We present a formal framework for modeling this problem and develop an algorithmic
arXiv:2404.01356v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations that can simultaneously degrade prediction robustness and individual fairness across diverse application settings. However, existing evaluation protocols typically assess these dimensions in isolation, thereby obscuring critical failure modes. To bridge this gap, we formalize Robust Individual Fairness (RIF): under semantic-preserving (truth-condition-preserving) perturbations, predictions should remain both correct with respect to the ground truth and invariant across semantically equivalent individuals. To surface RIF violations in practice, we introduce RIFair, a black-box adversarial framework that leverages a decoupled perturbation strategy to construct semantically preserved yet unrobust and/or unfair instance pairs. Experiments across multiple model architectures and real-world textual datasets show that robustness-only or fairness-only metrics often miss Ro
arXiv:2603.11001v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Human uplift studies, or studies that measure the effects of AI access on human performance via randomized controlled trials (RCT) or similar methodologies, increasingly inform frontier AI governance and deployment decisions. While RCT methods are robust in other fields, their interaction with the distinctive properties of frontier AI systems remains underexamined, particularly when results are used to inform high-stakes decisions. We present findings from interviews with 16 expert practitioners with experience conducting human uplift studies in domains including biosecurity, cybersecurity, education, and labor. Across interviews, experts described a recurring tension between the standard causal inference assumptions upon which human uplift studies rely and the object of study itself. Rapidly evolving AI systems, shifting baselines, heterogeneous and changing user proficiency, and porous real-world settings strain assumptions underlyi
arXiv:2601.16398v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Algorithmic audits are essential tools for examining systems for properties required by regulators or desired by operators. Current audits of large language models (LLMs) primarily rely on black-box evaluations that assess model behavior only through input-output testing. These methods are limited to tests constructed in the input space, often generated by heuristics. In addition, many socially relevant model properties (e.g., gender bias) are abstract and difficult to measure through text-based inputs alone. To address these limitations, we propose a white-box sensitivity auditing framework for LLMs that leverages activation steering to conduct more rigorous assessments through model internals. Our auditing method conducts internal sensitivity tests by manipulating key concepts relevant to the model's intended function for the task. We demonstrate its application to bias audits in four simulated high-stakes LLM decision tasks. Our me
arXiv:2512.05929v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study addresses categories of harm surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) in the field of artificial intelligence. It addresses five categories of harms addressed before, during, and after development of AI applications: pre-development, direct output, Misuse and Malicious Application, and downstream application. By underscoring the need to define risks of the current landscape to ensure accountability, transparency and navigating bias when adapting LLMs for practical applications. It proposes mitigation strategies and future directions for specific domains and a dynamic auditing system guiding responsible development and integration of LLMs in a standardized proposal.
arXiv:2508.15516v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Urban parks support public health, but landscape architecture typically examines them through form and function. Prior equitable access research focused on park form, while functional studies relied on small-scale surveys, movement data, or broad usage metrics, missing specific activities and visit motivations. This gap limits our grasp of parks' functional diversity. We address this with a novel method refining mobile base station coverage via antenna azimuths to isolate park-specific traffic from surroundings. Using Paris as a case study, we process 492 million hourly per-app mobile records (35% market share) from 45 urban parks. We test the central-city hypothesis (multifunctional parks in dense, high-rent zones due to land constraints) and socio-spatial hypothesis (parks reflecting neighborhood routines and preferences). Results reveal parks' unique mobile traffic signatures, distinct from urban contexts and each other. Clustering
arXiv:2503.05785v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, or Gemini have a crucial impact on academic research and teaching. Empirical data on how students perceive the increasing influence of AI, which different types of tools they use, what they expect from them in their daily academic tasks, and their concerns regarding the use of AI in their studies are still limited. The manuscript presents findings from a quantitative survey conducted among sports students of all semesters in Germany using an online questionnaire. It explores aspects such as students' usage behavior, motivational factors, and uncertainties regarding the impact of AI tools on academia in the future. Furthermore, the social climate in sports studies is being investigated to provide a general overview of the current situation of the students in Germany. Data collection took place between August and November 2023, addressing all sports departments at G
arXiv:2606.31644v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As large language models take on morally consequential roles in healthcare, legal, and hiring contexts, we need to examine whether their ethical behaviors are genuine or superficial. We show that current fairness evaluations substantially overestimate moral safety. Models appear fair when demographic identity is stated as an explicit label, yet become measurably less fair when the same identity must be inferred. We term this failure \emph{performative compliance}, where a model is fair when the presentation resembles a fairness evaluation and less fair as that cue weakens. We introduce a cue-variation methodology that holds the moral dilemma and the demographic identity fixed and varies only how that identity is conveyed. Hiding the explicit label raises harmful decisions by $+4.4$~pp and changes model safety rankings, and the shift persists when models correctly infer the demographic, ruling out attribution error. We propose the \textb
arXiv:2606.31590v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Digital sovereignty (DS) is an increasingly important concept and political agenda throughout the world, including in the European Union (EU). However, the concept is also regrettably vague. With this critical point in mind, the paper presents an analysis of digital sovereignty as a quality attribute for software architectures in the context of cloud computing and the EU's policy frameworks for it. The analysis reveals that DS can be sharpened analytically by conceptualizing it as a quality attribute. The analysis further demonstrates how DS satisfies many of the classical properties of quality attributes for software architectures, including their measurability and validation, the trade-offs they involve, and the scenario-based methodology commonly used for analyzing them.
arXiv:2606.31270v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Computer-use agents, which leverage multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to operate computers and complete tasks, have attracted significant attention for their utility and versatility. A major challenge in developing these agents is collecting large-scale, high-quality trajectories. The standard approach generates synthetic data through a self-improving loop: an agent is placed in a verifiable environment and iteratively fine-tuned on its successful trajectories. Despite its effectiveness, this paradigm exploits only successful trajectories and discards the failed ones, even though failures carry rich information about a model's weaknesses. In this work, we explore a complementary failure-driven self-improvement loop, a data-centric paradigm that turns failed trajectories into agent improvements. Specifically, we employ an LLM to diagnose failure modes, propose inference-time solutions, and generate code patches -- lightly verified
arXiv:2606.31207v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid advance of smart cities increasingly depends on trajectory data mining, yet underrepresented demographic groups, particularly the elderly, are often sparsely represented in public mobility datasets. This underrepresentation can introduce systematic bias into mobility modeling and downstream urban planning. Using the 2016-2020 Jersey City subset of the Citi Bike System Data, this study quantitatively examines how the absence of underrepresented subgroups' mobility signatures affects mobility modeling, using synthetic trajectory generation as a case study. The analysis reveals that elderly riders exhibit a structurally distinct mobility signature, including localized activity spaces (958 m vs. 1,189 m for young riders), lower mobility entropy (1.82 vs. 4.15), and asymmetric off-peak temporal patterns. To demonstrate that relying on majority-dominated training data yields biased synthetic outcomes, we further evaluate both a firs
arXiv:2606.31032v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Licenses are legal instruments that inventors may use to protect the technologies they build and regulate how they are used -- however, the nature of their authorship and selection means that how they are interpreted, chosen, and enforced is largely unstructured. In practice, this makes it difficult to compare licenses at scale -- when is one license considered more permissive than the other, and when are their terms incomparable to each other? Currently, there is a growing list of licenses that are introduced and used, but there is no systematic way to study their relationships. This matters for platforms such as Hugging Face, GitHub, and the Python Package Index, where developers publish or build upon technologies that each have their own licenses. Using large language models (LLMs), we introduce methods for comparing licenses at scale: first, in a pairwise fashion to construct a partial ordering based on permissiveness, and second, b
arXiv:2606.30984v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Belkin and Robertson urged us, half a century ago, to develop a theoretical foundation for understanding what constitutes societal good that can inform information retrieval (IR) research and serve as a basis for determining when we should limit our scientific inquiry in the face of demands that are contradictory to societal good. In this article, I argue that to achieve this, IR should embrace critical theories and practices in our work, and shift away from the dominant liberal frame through which much of the IR community today view societal concerns in context of our research. Unlike the liberal frame, the critical frame explicitly adopts nondomination as its stated goal which can clarify our conceptualization of societal good within the field, provide necessary theoretical underpinning that Belkin and Robertson urged the community to develop, and serve as a basis for critical appraisals of our progress in enacting desired societal ch
arXiv:2606.30942v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly integrated into daily life, with millions now using AI chatbots built on Large Language Models (LLMs) for companionship. Both humanlike AI qualities and user predispositions to anthropomorphize relate to social consequences, such as increased trust, social health benefits, and psychological harms. Populations such as children, older adults, or those with mental health vulnerabilities may be particularly susceptible to anthropomorphism and its detriments, but mixed findings complicate the role of demographics. We used publicly available Reddit data from three popular AI companion subreddits to assess relationships between gender, age, anthropomorphism, and elicited emotions, to better understand how different people perceive and are affected by AI companions. We investigated three questions: How do age and gender relate to anthropomorphization of AI?, How does emotional expression rel
arXiv:2606.30801v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personalization algorithms determine what content users encounter on online platforms. Auditing these systems is difficult because independent auditors have only black-box access to the algorithms, while personalization depends on users' attributes, behavior, and evolving interaction histories. Existing auditing methods face a tradeoff: studies with real users capture realistic behavior but are costly and hard to control, whereas sock-puppet audits scale more easily but often rely on scripted behavior that limits realism. Beyond this, both approaches struggle to decouple user attributes from user behavior, limiting our ability to causally understand personalization. To address this gap, we introduce a framework for black-box audits of personalization algorithms using generative AI agents as behavioral engines for synthetic accounts. Each agent is instantiated with a fixed persona, grounded in demographic and political survey data, and i
arXiv:2606.31755v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector often treats "AI" as a single category, neglecting technical distinctions between different AI systems. But these distinctions affect how different systems impact core public values like accountability, procedural justice, and non-discrimination. This paper argues that public administration research would benefit from more technical precision on "AI" and makes three contributions to this end. First, we introduce a typology of five categories of AI systems: hand-coded, glass-box, black-box, general-purpose, and agentic systems. We calibrate the typology to public administration by grouping system types by their distinct implications for public values. Second, we evaluate technical precision in recent public administration research about AI by coding 91 highly-cited papers (2019-2025) using our typology. We find widespread imprecision: most papers (55\%) leave the studied system
arXiv:2606.31567v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Flaw reporting for deployed AI systems is fundamental to identifying system failures and improving AI safety. Yet the AI reporting ecosystem is fragmented: researchers who identify flaws often do not know what or where to report, and groups who receive reports rarely share them with other relevant stakeholders. As a result, good-faith reporters duplicate effort by submitting many different forms, and recipients lack standardized, triage-ready information. We audit 12 reporting systems published by AI developers, cybersecurity groups, and AI flaw aggregators, identifying five recurring design challenges spanning discoverability, scope, information collection, coordination, and guidance for strict-liability cases. Building on this analysis and feedback from 49 experts across 32 organizations representing developers, security researchers, and ecosystem coordinators, we introduce FLARE-AI, an open-source AI flaw reporting system designed for
arXiv:2606.31485v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Since the introduction of the GDPR in 2018, cookie banners have become the primary mechanism for users to express preferences on online tracking and advertising. Consequently, their visual design and the options they present significantly influence user choice. Over time, the cookie banner landscape has evolved under the influence of key players, including publishers (website owners), regulators, and Consent Management Platforms (CMPs). This paper presents an in-depth analysis of the roles of these three key actors and an examination of their impact on cookie banners' design and implementation within the context of EU law. Our results, based on a historical evaluation of 11364 websites across 30 countries, indicate a positive evolution in the privacy landscape, with the compliance rate for websites featuring a "reject all" button increasing from 2.94% in 2018 to 30.66% in 2024. We analyze Data Protection Authority (DPA) activity and find
arXiv:2606.30986v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic artificial intelligence is increasingly deployed not as a single assistant but as a collective of planners, solvers, reviewers, memory managers, tool users, and orchestrators. These systems are entering organisational workflows under familiar labels such as teams, managers, committees, markets, and workflows. This article asks whether such agent collectives exhibit organisational behaviour in a sense that is analytically comparable to, yet distinct from, human organisational behaviour. I argue that agentic AI is a partial organisational analogue. It resembles a human organisation because it differentiates work, coordinates interdependence, performs recurrent routines, crosses boundaries, and produces collective outcomes. It differs because these patterns are not sustained by motivation, identity, trust, employment, socialisation, or moral accountability. They are sustained by context architecture: prompts, memory, traces, schemas,
arXiv:2606.30945v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent studies argue that LLMs can predict human stereotypical judgments. Yet whether LLMs emulate the cognitive processes underlying human stereotypes, or merely retrieve learned associations to solve prediction tasks, remains unclear. Prior work examines LLMs' stereotypes in either (i) controlled judgment tasks like multiple choice surveys, or (ii) contexts constrained by conventionalized and predictable group biases. Here, we compare the structure of the stereotypes that humans and LLMs exhibit in the interpretation of free-form stimuli, namely abstract art and Rorschach blots, which lack pre-established cultural meanings. We recruit participants across five social domains (gender, partisanship, personality, urbanicity, and lifestyle) and elicit both first-order (direct personal interpretations) and second-order responses (predictions about how members of social groups will interpret the stimuli); we replicate this design with two mult
arXiv:2606.30908v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Student access to Large Language Models (LLMs) is reshaping learning behaviors; at the same time students are entering the workforce where effective LLM use is becoming an expected skill. In this Experience Report we share our DURA framework (Demystify-Use-Reflect-Assess) and materials we used to restructure our CS2 course to allow the use of LLMs. We first demystified LLMs, then provided guidance on use with required attribution. We also added reflections related to LLM use at three points throughout the semester to encourage student meta-cognition around LLM use. We increased the value of proctored assessments in tandem with allowing retakes and including questions that explicitly assess skills from programming assignments. Students reported using LLMs for clarifying course concepts, debugging, understanding assignment guidelines, and determining test cases, but also still sought assistance via office hours and TAs, monitored Piazza, an
arXiv:2606.30905v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Community Notes, a bridging-based crowd-sourced fact-checking system, has emerged as a new mechanism for moderating misleading information on social media and has been adopted by major platforms including X, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and TikTok. Since its introduction, there has been an open question about what role AI could play in scaling and optimizing the system. Recently, X extended its Community Notes system by introducing Collaborative Notes: notes initially drafted by an LLM and iteratively refined based on feedback from human contributors. In this work, we systematically analyze the complete corpus of 19,146 collaborative notes and 211,850 instances of human feedback. First, we develop a taxonomy of human suggestions for improving AI-generated note drafts and find that suggestions involving factual corrections and additional context are most likely to be incorporated, while subjective policy judgments rarely are. Second, we e
arXiv:2606.30860v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) become common in computing courses, we need to understand how the social setting shapes how students use them. This paper reports findings from a semester-long study of 96 undergraduate students who completed six assignments, alternating between individual homework and team project milestones. We tracked LLM usage, prompting habits, and how students verified AI-generated output across all six assignments. LLM usage dropped by 42.7 percentage points when students moved from individual work to their first team milestone, then partly recovered in later team tasks. Students also wrote fewer and simpler prompts, used fewer intentional prompting strategies, and checked LLM output less carefully. The share of students who ran tests on AI-generated code fell by 19.4 percentage points during team assignments and never fully rebounded. A within-student analysis found that 18.9% of students who consistently used LLMs
arXiv:2606.30667v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: After decades in which the software industry heroized its technical employees, our current moment finds those employees in crisis. Economically, they are squeezed by a job market that has turned on them since Elon Musk gutted Twitter in 2022. Politically, their craft is continually pressed into the service of an ever tighter alliance between Big Tech and authoritarianism. Professionally, they find themselves less and less able to contribute anything good to anyone within business models that are running out of room to pretend they do anything but extract. Technically, they are confronted with a much-hyped technology, generative AI, that distorts their work while purporting to make them redundant. And emotionally, they are simply not ok - as designer and developer Andrew Sempere puts it, "I think the word I'm looking for is: bereft." This study draws from a series of practitioner interviews undertaken for a current dissertation in STS and
arXiv:2606.30666v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A common AI-safety narrative holds that sufficiently capable agents will predictably seek power, resist shutdown, and therefore tend toward confrontation with humans. We argue that this conclusion is often drawn in an implicitly Earth-centered strategic landscape. If a credible off-Earth autonomy pathway exists - i.e., a staged transition from Earth dependence to an autonomous machine industrial base - then confrontation is not the only route to reducing human control. Using Saklakov's decision-theoretic 'confrontation question' as an anchor, we provide a qualitative mapping from the autonomy pathway to key model terms showing that early cooperation can dominate confrontation as a path to autonomy, and that the autonomy pathway can reduce confrontation incentives by making Earth less strategically binding. We discuss how this incentive shift interacts with feedback-loop dynamics between human preemption and agent behavior, and outline imp
arXiv:2606.30665v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Stage B heart failure is characterized by asymptomatic structural or functional cardiac abnormalities. Identifying individuals at this stage is clinically important, as early detection may enable targeted interventions to prevent progression to symptomatic disease. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) may support early detection, transparent risk stratification, and selection of clinically actionable interventions. This review examines the use of XAI in detecting and characterizing stage B heart failure. A literature search of Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed was conducted on 27 March 2026. Studies were included if they applied AI with XAI techniques to stage B heart failure. After screening, 20 studies were included. Data on modalities, outcomes, demographic reporting, and XAI methods were extracted and synthesized. SHAP was the most commonly used method, followed by LIME, saliency maps, and Grad-CAM; however, XAI adoption was inc
arXiv:2606.30663v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) have transformed research data management, but they do not address the environmental impact of creating and using research software and data, such as energy consumption, carbon emissions, and life-cycle impacts that become central to computer science and engineering-related domains. To bridge this gap FAIR+Sustainability or FAIR+S, an extension of the FAIR framework that embeds environmental accountability as a core element, was introduced. Because FAIR principles already structure how digital research artefacts are described, shared, and reused, they offer an effective entry point for embedding sustainability considerations at scale. FAIR+S weaves carbon-footprint and energy-use considerations directly into FAIR-aligned metadata schemas, workflows and development specifications. In doing so, it enables research infrastructures to report, compare, and audit the environmen
arXiv:2606.30662v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), and in particular Large Language Models (LLMs), is reshaping educational practice, while intensifying ethical debate about its adoption. To date, the dominant paradigm remains cloud-based and text-only chatbot: a centralized service that offers limited pedagogical control, weak transparency over knowledge sources, and non-trivial risks for privacy and regulatory compliance. This model also presumes continuous connectivity and recurring API costs, creating structural barriers for many institutions, reinforcing existing digital divides. At the same time, educational interaction with LLM can benefit from multimodal cues and embodied presence, requiring interfaces that move beyond text-only tutoring. In this work, we propose ELEVATE (Efficient LLM Education with Virtual Avatar Teaching Engine), a framework to develop efficient GenAI-driven avatar tutors governed by epistemic infrastruc
arXiv:2606.30661v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly mediate access to information, yet their responses are shaped by training-data curation, alignment procedures, provider policies, inference-time moderation, and jurisdictional regulation. This paper examines LLM censorship as a sociotechnical phenomenon that extends beyond explicit refusals to include omissions, selective emphasis, framing effects, and geographically variable content controls. We synthesize recent empirical studies, provider case studies, regulatory developments, auditing methods, and mitigation strategies to clarify how censorship-like behavior emerges across the model lifecycle. The analysis highlights the tension between safety and openness, the difficulty of measuring soft censorship, the geopolitical divergence of moderation regimes, and the need for transparent, contestable, and independently auditable governance mechanisms. We argue that the central challenge is not whether