Named after the hundred-eyed watchman of Greek myth, Argus watches the education landscape: spotting new opportunities, pressure-testing the ventures we're building, and tracing every read back to the real-world signals behind it.
The evidence library: the raw signals the pipeline is watching across the education ecosystem. Every idea is built from these.
arXiv:2601.14429v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Open science initiatives have strengthened scientific integrity and accelerated research progress across many fields, but the state of their practice within transportation research remains under-investigated. Key features of open science, defined here as data and code availability, are difficult to extract due to the inherent complexity of the field. Previous work has either been limited to small-scale studies due to the labor-intensive nature of manual analysis or has relied on large-scale bibliometric approaches that sacrifice contextual richness. This paper introduces an automatic and scalable feature-extraction pipeline to measure code and data availability in transportation research. We employ Large Language Models (LLMs) for this task and validate their performance against a manually curated dataset and through an inter-rater agreement analysis. We applied this pipeline to examine 10,724 research articles published in the
arXiv:2508.05775v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized content creation across digital platforms, offering unprecedented capabilities in natural language generation and understanding. Meanwhile, they pose risks by inadvertently producing toxic, offensive, or biased content. This dual role of LLMs, both as powerful tools for text generation and as potential sources of harmful language, presents a pressing sociotechnical challenge. In this survey, we systematically review recent studies encompassing unintentional toxicity, adversarial jailbreak attacks, and comprehensive mitigation strategies. We explore LLMs' dual role as both generators of harm and enablers of safety through detection, classification, content moderation, and prevention. We propose a unified taxonomy of LLM-related harms and defenses, analyze emerging multimodal and LLM-assisted jailbreak strategies, and assess mitigation efforts, including reinforcement learning with
arXiv:2508.03037v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Artists occupy a paradoxical position in generative AI. Their own work trains models that now compete with them, replicate their styles, and reshape the creative economy they inhabit. Yet whether artist concerns achieve proportional representation in the public discourse that shapes AI governance remains an open empirical question. We mapped the semantic landscape of public AI-art discourse from 2013 to 2025, drawing on 1,736 text chunks from news, podcasts, legal filings, and research, and projected 252 US-based practising artists' survey responses, captured across 70 unique frames spanning five concern dimensions, into the same space. We identify what we term semantic compression, the systematic narrowing of a diverse set of stakeholder concerns into a narrow region of public meaning-space. Compression is selective. Nearly all artist statements concentrate in just two of twenty discourse topics, while most of the remaining dis
arXiv:2311.18424v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Developing artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for healthcare is a collaborative effort, bringing data scientists, clinicians, patients and other stakeholders together. By understanding AI as 'sociotechnical' where the social and the technical nature of the work and the models are inseparable, we explore the AI development workflow and how stakeholders navigate the challenges and tensions of sharing and generating knowledge across disciplines. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of 13 semi-structured interviews with participants in early stages of AI-in-healthcare research consortia in the UK. Our findings identify that participants needed to adapt both the tools used for sharing and the information communicated according to their audience, particularly when working with those with a clinical or patient perspective. We identify the novelty of participating in AI research, how AI knowledge is shared, and the inclusion
arXiv:2604.03881v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Encouraging pro-environmental behavior remains a major challenge for sustainable cities. Conventional feedback nudges can show individuals how their current behavior compares with environmental goals but often provide limited guidance on what to do differently in daily life. This study examines whether supplementing weekly feedback on participants' behavior with LLM-generated personalized action suggestions improves pro-environmental behavior, using daily electricity and hot-water conservation as a case study. We developed an LLM agent that generated weekly conservation messages from participant profiles, recent consumption records, and prior interaction history, combining a usage report with personalized suggestions, behavioral-change scenarios, and estimated savings. The agent was evaluated in a three-arm randomized field experiment with 233 university residents in Beijing from November 2024 to January 2025. Participants received te
arXiv:2602.08554v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This workshop paper examines challenges in designing agentic AI systems from a citizen-centric perspective. Drawing on three participatory workshops conducted in 2025 with members of the general public and cross-sector stakeholders, we explore how societal values and expectations shape visions of future AI agents. Using constructive design research methods, participants engaged in storytelling and lo-fi prototyping to reflect on potential community impacts. We identify three key challenges: enabling meaningful and sustained public engagement, establishing a shared language between experts and lay participants, and translating speculative participant input into implementable systems. We argue that reflexive, long-term participation is essential for responsible and actionable citizen-centric AI development.
arXiv:2507.11548v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The use of publicly available generative AI systems for resume evaluation is often justified by the assumption that these tools reduce bias relative to human judgment. However, this framing leaves a prior question unresolved: whether these systems are capable of performing the evaluative task at all. This study presents a two-part audit of eight widely used AI platforms used for resume screening. Drawing on the concept of the Illusion of Neutrality, the study examines cases in which systems appear demographically unbiased because they lack the ability to meaningfully differentiate among candidates. Experiment 1 evaluates racial and gender bias using matched fictitious resumes and finds that bias persists in context-dependent and intersectional forms. Some models penalize candidates for the presence of demographic signals, while others exhibit inconsistent patterns across roles and identities under controlled conditions. Experiment 2 e
arXiv:2607.26034v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Technological races create tension between speed and safety: actors may gain by moving faster than competitors, even when risky development is harmful. This is prominent in debates about artificial intelligence (AI), where competitive pressure is often argued to incentivise riskier, less safety-conscious development. We study this using a framed behavioural experiment based on an idealised AI race, in which paired participants repeatedly chose between Safe and Unsafe development under an uncertain time horizon. Unsafe development gave faster progress and higher immediate payoffs but accumulated private risk up to a treatment-specific maximum of 10\%, 60\%, or 90\%; the race's competitive structure was held constant, and only this maximum risk varied. Neither the pre-registered comparison between risk levels nor the role of elicited risk preferences was supported by the data. Instead, exploratory analyses motivated by the task's repeated
arXiv:2607.25974v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Observed standardized test scores are the result of an endogenous process: students strategically allocate effort across multiple retake attempts to improve their outcomes. Because students differ in their ability to make these investments, the interaction between applicant strategy and institutional scoring rules---such as the widely used Single-Sitting and Superscoring policies---can disparately distort observed scores. We develop a strategic framework where students allocate effort in response to different scoring policies. We show that Superscoring---the practice of combining the best section scores across attempts---introduces systematic score inflation through order-statistic selection over noise draws. This degrades signal accuracy and amplifies wealth-based disparities by disproportionately rewarding applicants who can afford repeated testing. Conversely, Single-Sitting---which keeps the best overall score rather than section-le
arXiv:2607.25953v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As LLMs increasingly mediate the political information citizens rely on, there is still no standardized way to assess whether they do so responsibly. We introduce Polistemics, a theory-grounded benchmark for evaluating LLMs as mediators of political information in elections. Prior work has treated this task as reproduction rather than mediation, leaving its epistemic dimensions and interaction with imperfect information unaddressed. We ground the evaluation in Epistemic Modesty, a normative standard derived from citizens' epistemic agency, and test it across controlled settings that vary informational properties such as clarity, noise, and consistency. Applying the benchmark to three state-of-the-art LLMs on the 2025 German and Dutch elections, we find that high aggregate scores mask systematic failures. Models mediate reliably under clear evidence but break down under absent, vague, or contradictory information, while flattening the in
arXiv:2607.25750v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning has made it cheap and easy to customize open-weight image generation models for specific tasks, including the production of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Existing moderation relies on metadata or generated outputs, but metadata can be deceptive and generating outputs may itself be unacceptable or illegal. We show that a safer signal lives in the weights. The top-left singular vectors of a LoRA's updates form a compact, inference-free fingerprint ($u_1$) of its strongest learned change. Using human-subject age as a benign proxy for CSAM, we find that $u_1$ identifies what a LoRA was trained on, generalizes across base models, and abstains on unrelated benign content. The signal is robust to additive weight noise, rescaling, and precision reduction. These results indicate that harmful LoRAs could be screened directly from their weights without relying on metadata or generating harmful outputs.
arXiv:2607.25458v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Resilience denotes the capacity of a system to withstand shocks and to recover from them. We distinguish between two different types of dynamics. The first allows for a separation between phases of normalcy and phases of rapid breakdown followed by slow recovery. The second applies to volatile organizations in which such phases are intertwined. Breakdown is often self-inflicted. Situation awareness is impaired by psychological mechanisms that lead to incorrect expectations regarding societal dynamics. Through positive feedback, the failure of a few elements is amplified into a failure cascade. However, positive feedback can also be harnessed to enable recovery. In volatile systems, resilience must be understood as an emergent property arising from the interaction of agents. This necessitates a data-driven approach to inform agent-based models, drawing on repositories, knowledge graphs, or tools from artificial intelligence. Such models
arXiv:2607.25425v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Capture the Flag (CTF) competitions are among cybersecurity's most effective training grounds, developing practical skill across cryptography, web exploitation, and binary exploitation. Large language models (LLMs) can now solve a growing share of challenges with minimal human input, raising urgent questions about fairness, the validity of rankings, and whether participation still delivers the learning that justifies the effort. This paper reports a mixed-methods study of LLM impact on modern CTFs, combining a synthesis of published benchmarks, including a recent government evaluation, case studies of live competition across three challenge categories, structured observation of the public channels where the community debates AI use, and semi-structured interviews with experienced players and organisers. We map the current human-machine capability boundary by category, showing that easy and intermediate challenges in cryptography, web, a
arXiv:2607.25057v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As conversational AI systems become increasingly integrated into daily life, their potential effects on user well-being require ongoing attention. While consumer-facing generalist models can provide benefits, including improved access to information, learning, productivity, self-reflection, and companionship, they also introduce risks, such as emotional entanglement, unhealthy dependence, and the amplification of psychological vulnerabilities. Drawing on prior research and empirical observations of AI chatbot behavior, we propose a set of aspirational directions for guiding the behavior of general-purpose AI systems in ways that may reduce potential psychological harms and support user well-being. We acknowledge the difficulty of systematically assessing the long-term impacts of AI chatbot use and frame these directions as hypotheses for studying how AI behavior may influence users across general interactions, role-playing scenarios, an
arXiv:2607.25010v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-assisted production has sharply reduced the cost and team size required to ship a video game, producing a supply shock on open marketplaces. Recent estimates put Steam release volume at roughly sixty new titles per day, with median per-title revenue for a large share of releases falling below the platform's own submission fee [1]. This paper asks whether the resulting oversupply constitutes an emerging market crash or a structural correction, and what discovery infrastructure the market will require as a consequence. We first quantify the 2010-2026 supply shock using a 93,073-title Steam metadata snapshot, a 200,000-interaction Steam user-behavior dataset, and itch.io catalog data, computing attention-concentration metrics directly (Gini coefficient of 0.96 over playtime, with the top 1 percent of titles absorbing 73.5 percent of total play hours), and we introduce generative asset-model release velocity on Hugging Face as a candidat
arXiv:2607.24775v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly deployed in domains where empathy is essential, including healthcare, education, and customer service. However, their capacity to sustain authentic human moments remains structurally limited. This paper introduces two interlinked conceptual models to explain and address this limitation. First, the Human-Moment Gap Framework (HMGF) identifies three structural empathy deficits in AI-mediated interaction: affective surfaceism (emotional imitation without depth), memory fragmentation (lack of relational continuity), and moral framing mismatch (efficiency prioritised over dignity). Second, the paper develops the Empathy Displacement Theory (EDT), which explains how AI-simulated empathy can progressively substitute, distort, and displace genuine human empathy across individual, relational, and organisational contexts. HMGF serves as the causal foundation of EDT by demonstrating how techni
arXiv:2607.24768v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prenatal care is an important preventive service designed to improve outcomes for pregnant individuals. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recently introduced guidelines advocating tailored prenatal care, called PATH (Plan for Tailored Healthcare). We present PATHFinder Agent(Planner for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare), an end-to-end conversational agentic system that gathers patient health and social context through structured dialogue, curates individualized prenatal care plans aligned with PATH guidelines, and surfaces community resources from Michigan 211. The system features a four-stage workflow spanning patient intake, dynamic interaction, plan synthesis, and clinician oversight. We evaluate frontier large language models (LLMs) on expert-curated rubrics across five clinical dimensions, finding that GPT-5.2 achieves the highest average score (77.6\%) while identifying key gaps in antenatal testing rec
arXiv:2607.24759v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Research projects, educational efforts, and adjacent knowledge work accumulate findings, decisions, and reasoning that future collaborators rarely recover. The parts most useful to that work, including dead ends and walked-back claims, are routinely excluded from publications and shared code; future researchers re-attempt the same failures because no record survives. LLM coding agents are common participants but hold no persistent memory across sessions, and retrieval-augmented generation over raw sources does not compound. The llm-wiki pattern (Karpathy, 2026; tonbi, 2026) addresses this by inserting an LLM-maintained, interlinked wiki between raw sources and the agent. We present llm-wiki-memory-template, a reusable, agent-aware instantiation, and argue it is a substrate for heterogeneous collaborative knowledge work along three axes (multi-human, multi-AI-agent, multi-domain) with each axis supported by a distinct architectural eleme
arXiv:2607.24757v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper reports on the rapid development and classroom deployment of a Thonny log visualizer built using AI-assisted ``vibe coding'' to make students' programming processes easily visible to teachers. We developed a web application that analyzes log files generated by Thonny (an IDE for Python) and produces interpretable views of students' programming processes. Teachers can upload a log, a ZIP archive, or a folder containing logs for a group or the course; the system parses all logs, generates results per student, and provides student-by-student navigation for reviewing cases. Each student's view includes an interactive activity timeline, a compact session summary, a code-size graph, a programming-process replay, and more. These views support teacher decision-making by enabling the identification of learning-support situations and flagging sessions for academic-integrity clarification. The tool was initially evaluated using logs fro
arXiv:2607.24755v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This full research paper examines how different forms of learner-AI interaction relate to learning outcomes in object-oriented programming (OOP) courses. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools are increasingly used by students in programming education, yet evidence on their educational impact remains mixed. In particular, little is known about how students integrate GenAI tools when learning OOP, and how different patterns of use relate to students' learning experiences and outcomes. This study investigates patterns of students' self-directed GenAI use and their relationship with academic performance, perceived difficulty, understanding, and trust. Survey data were collected from 210 undergraduate students enrolled in a first-year OOP course in which the use of GenAI tools was permitted for coursework but prohibited in assessments. Results show that students used GenAI significantly more often for explanation seeking and debug
arXiv:2607.24749v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Although advancements in game character AI aim to enhance player engagement, evidence suggests that perceiving an opponent as artificial can diminish the psychological experience. This paper presents a scoping review and meta-analysis of empirical studies focusing on player enjoyment when competing against human versus computer opponents. First, the scoping review was conducted to map the landscape of 20 included studies, detailing their study designs, outcome measures, and research foci. Second, a three-level meta-analysis synthesizing baseline comparisons from nine studies quantitatively assesses the differences in enjoyment. The results demonstrate a statistically significant, medium-to-large pooled effect size, indicating a psychological penalty in computer-opponent conditions. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the extant knowledge on this topic, and underscores the necessity for further research in order to fully unde
arXiv:2607.25648v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Public services face growing pressure to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) to close the gap between rising demand and falling resources. That pressure has intensified with general-purpose AI (GPAI): AI built on large language models that can be directed by prompt alone to perform an effectively unbounded range of tasks. We argue that the properties that make these models attractive - their generality, accessibility, and low deployment cost - undermine the conditions under which AI safety has historically been pursued. The safety concepts that public service governance frameworks foreground - accuracy, bias, explainability, and accountability - were made tractable by narrow, purpose-built AI, and the mitigations that guidance documents prescribe presuppose exactly what GPAI removes. Accuracy cannot be quantified over unbounded outputs. Bias cannot be disaggregated when outputs are free-text judgements rather than categorical predictions.
arXiv:2607.25526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How should researchers measure the geopolitical preferences expressed by large language models (LLMs)? Existing audits commonly rely on surveys and simple tests, but international-relations research has long recognized that measuring geopolitical preferences is difficult and has developed methods for recovering them from observed choices. This paper applies a dynamic ordinal ideal-point approach from international relations, treating LLMs as respondents to the full texts of 5,555 divisive, recorded, adopted resolutions considered in regular sessions of the UN General Assembly from 1946 through 2025. Support ranges from 37.8% for DeepSeek to 97.3% for GPT-5. Surprisingly, in the twenty-first century, GPT-5, Claude Sonnet, and Gemini are closest among the permanent five to Russia; DeepSeek is closest to France; and all four are farthest from the United States. Among 2,104 resolutions opposed by the United States but supported by China and R
arXiv:2607.25301v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Resting heart rate is an established marker of cardiovascular risk, but population-scale measurement has depended on clinical or survey instruments. We ask whether passively sensed consumer-wearable physiology recovers the socioeconomic gradient established in clinical cohorts. Using 19.1 million quality-filtered photoplethysmography readings from 18,734 opt-in users of the Welltory app, we computed cohort-adjusted mean daytime resting heart rate per US state and related it to a four-component state-level material-hardship composite (uninsurance, food insecurity, utility shutoff, housing insecurity; 41 states with module coverage, 12,497 contributing users). Adjusting for six state health and behaviour indicators, latitude, median age, and density, state resting heart rate tracked hardship at partial Spearman $\rho = +0.74$ (bootstrap 95\% CI $[+0.31, +0.87]$; $[+0.06, +0.79]$ under a conservative two-stage bootstrap that also resamples u
arXiv:2607.25240v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Why do societies composed of individuals pursuing individuality repeatedly generate highly standardized systems? This paper argues that the answer lies in the evolution of information processing capacity. Artificial intelligence represents a historical transition in this capacity, enabling social systems to accommodate forms of complexity that previously had to be compressed. Industrial standardization was not merely a consequence of capital preference or power relations, but an institutional arrangement for maintaining the manageability of large-scale systems under limited information-processing capacity by reducing the variety of the controlled system. The fundamental change in the AI era lies in the expansion of information processing capacity across three dimensions: perception, computation, and execution. This expansion shifts personalized production from physical adaptation toward information-based adaptation and enables a transitio
arXiv:2607.25105v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Social choice theory research demonstrates that single transferable voting (STV) results in more proportionally representative legislative bodies. We aim to understand how using multi-member districts and ranked ballots with STV would affect the representation of political parties in the Colorado House of Representatives. We investigated this objective by producing 10,000 multi-member districting plans of Colorado, generating ranked ballots for each of these plans using returns from the 2022 Colorado attorney general race, and simulating STV using these ballots. Our simulated STV elections for the Colorado House of Representatives gave more proportional representation for Democrats and Republicans than the current first-past-the-post system. Future research should explore how the implementation of STV would influence the representation of racial and language minority groups in the Colorado General Assembly to provide guidance on electoral
arXiv:2603.00708v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Voting is the primary mechanism through which Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs) reach decisions. Although transparent, the voting process can be opaque: it can involve many interacting smart contracts. The nexus of the decision-making process can be relocated and the true voter demographic obfuscated. DAOs can also govern other DAOs, a process known as metagovernance. We present a method for identifying DAO-to-DAO metagovernance on the Ethereum blockchain. We focus on the links between DAOs and token contracts. We use a signature-matching algorithm to handle a variety of DAO frameworks and voting schemes. Once we establish token-to-DAO relationships, we gather and process voting data to produce a list of metagovernance relationships. We apply this algorithm to an initial set of sixteen DAOs and we extend the dataset as more DAOs are identified. We produce a metagovernance network with 61 DAOs and 72 metagovernance re
arXiv:2509.15959v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Autonomous navigation in maritime domains is accelerating alongside advances in artificial intelligence, sensing, and connectivity. Opaque decision-making and poorly calibrated human-automation interaction remain key barriers to safe adoption. This article synthesizes 100 studies on automation transparency for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) spanning situation awareness (SA), human factors, interface design, and regulation. We (i) map the Guidance-Navigation-Control stack to shore-based operational modes, namely remote supervision (RSM) and remote control (RCM), and identify where human unsafe control actions (Human-UCAs) concentrate in handover and emergency loops; (ii) summarize evidence that transparency features (decision rationales, alternatives, confidence/uncertainty, and rule-compliance indicators) improve understanding and support trust calibration, though reliability and predictability often dominate trust; (i
arXiv:2512.06529v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Required broader coursework can secure participation without being recognised as legitimate computing knowledge. This study conceptualises this disconnect as a curricular legitimacy gap and tests an asymmetric appraisal model grounded in situated expectancy value theory. The model distinguishes curricular devaluation, judging broader coursework unnecessary or professionally irrelevant, from integrative intention, or willingness to reuse its learning. Survey data from 212 Computer Science and Engineering undergraduates in Bangladesh recruited through snowball sampling were analysed using robust structural equation modelling. Primary inference combined robust direct-path estimates with 5,000 respondent-level bootstrap resamples; alternative measurement, response-quality, and ordinal-estimator specifications were also examined. Perceived burden was positively associated with devaluation, which was negatively associated with intention. Th
arXiv:2509.25298v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study investigates the shifting global dynamics of Artificial Intelligence (AI) research by analysing the trajectories of countries dominating AI publications between 2000 and 2025. Drawing on the comprehensive OpenAlex datasets and employing fractional counting to avoid double attribution in co-authored work, the research maps the relative shares of AI publications across major global players. The analysis reveals a profound restructuring of the international AI research landscape. The US and the European Union (representing EU27), once the undisputed and established leaders, have experienced a notable decline in relative dominance, with their combined share of publications falling from over 57% in 2000 to less than 25% in 2025. In contrast, China has undergone a dramatic ascent, expanding its global share of AI publications from under 5% in 2000 to nearly 36% by 2025, therefore emerging as the single most dominant contributor.
arXiv:2411.08908v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study explores the intersection of technological innovation and environmental sustainability in the context of Bitcoin mining. With Bitcoin's growing adoption, concerns surrounding the energy consumption and environmental impact of mining activities have intensified. The study examines the core process of Bitcoin mining, focusing on its energy-intensive proof-of-work mechanism, and provides a detailed analysis of its ecological footprint, especially in terms of carbon emissions and electronic waste. Various models estimate that Bitcoin's energy consumption rivals that of entire nations, highlighting serious sustainability concerns. To address these issues, the paper unearths potential technological innovations, such as energy-efficient mining hardware and the integration of renewable energy sources, as viable strategies to reduce environmental impact. Additionally, the study reviews current sustainability initiatives, including e
arXiv:2608.24767v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative AI (genAI) systems become embedded in education, employment, healthcare, and creative industries, the impact and engagement among marginalized groups have become both a widespread discourse and a focus in scholarly research. As a starting point, we examine public discourse and empirical research to explore the impact of genAI systems on Black communities. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of 91 empirical papers alongside a media discourse frame analysis of 28 public resources, applying Entman's framing theory to map how each corpus defines problems, attributes causes, and proposes treatments. Our SLR reveals that scholarly research concentrates heavily on technical bias detection, reducing Blackness to measurable variables rather than engaging with cultural practices, structural conditions, or Black knowledge systems. Our frame analysis reveals that public discourse attributes genAI-related harm to historic
arXiv:2608.24662v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are commonly evaluated under the assumption that their observable behavior is primarily determined by model weights, training data, alignment procedures, and user prompts. This view is incomplete. Modern inference pipelines may systematically modify the probability distribution produced by a model immediately before token selection, creating an additional layer of control between frozen weights and observed text. While controlled generation (e.g., PPLM, GeDi, DExperts, FUDGE) and text-watermarking systems (e.g., SynthID-Text) demonstrate the technical maturity of decoding- and logit-level interventions, the governance, security, and economic implications of an undisclosed inference policy remain comparatively underexplored. This paper examines the emergence of inference-time framing bias: the systematic modification of generated language toward political, ideological, institutional, or commercial frames via
arXiv:2608.24654v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conversational AI systems (CAISes) continuously change through model releases, feature updates, safety interventions, and access-policy shifts, yet user perceptions are often studied as static snapshots. We conduct a long-term, large-scale analysis of Reddit discussions to examine how users perceive CAIS model release interventions across providers. By combining sentiment classification and thematic concept analysis, we show that CAIS perceptions are dynamic and intervention-sensitive. Anthropic exhibits the clearest positive release profile through Claude Code and product-model fit, OpenAI shows backlash-and-recovery dynamics around GPT-5 and GPT-5.1, Grok-3 is shaped by provider identity and political discourse, and DeepSeek-R1 combines engineering praise with concerns about censorship, access, and reliability. These findings show that model releases are not merely technical updates, but user-facing interventions that reshape sentimen
arXiv:2608.24127v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Telephone fraud is pervasive and costly, but its inner workings are rarely observed at scale. We analyze a complete corpus of 10,211 inbound scam and spam calls -- 913 hours of audio and 330,956 transcribed turns from 5,780 distinct numbers -- collected over 54 days by an AI voice-agent honeypot that answered callers and kept them talking, and introduced in a companion data descriptor. We separate outright scams, which solicit sensitive information, from the larger stream of predatory but legal lead generation ("spam") that feeds them. Scam operations keep office hours (6.6x more calls per weekday than weekend day); thousands of disposable numbers run a small catalog of recycled scripts (thirty opening clusters, half the traffic in the top five); and callers solicit identity anchors -- a home address and a date of birth -- far more often than payment credentials, pressing through persistence and manufactured authority rather than overt
arXiv:2608.23979v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In a deliberative poll, once submissions outnumber what anyone will read, some mechanism chooses which arguments each voter sees, acquiring much of the decision; practice delegates it to opaque learned rankers, so a voter cannot recompute or contest the exposure that shaped their vote. We ask whether it can be a published rule over publicly recomputable evidence with parameters held by the voter, treating legibility as an admissibility condition on usable mechanisms, not an objective traded against accuracy. We formalise a poll over bipolar justification sets, judging a slate by reason coverage, the order it arrives in, and captured endorsement mass; we give seven checkable criteria for a civic recommender and a rule meeting them: a one-hop reversed endorsement flow parameterised by a relation-weight function. An agentic simulator records every slate at every vote, over about 17,000 seed-paired runs. Served slates fall 0.035 short of a
arXiv:2608.23968v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being embedded into all facets of society, from search to education, industrial, and financial applications. These systems' carbon and water footprints raise important sustainability concerns, particularly with adoption rates exceeding 80% among university students, despite limited insight into the environmental impacts of individual usage. Eco-feedback interfaces offer a promising approach to encourage more sustainable behaviors, yet their role in shaping LLM users' sustainability awareness and decision-making remains underexplored. We design and deploy the interface that visualizes latency-carbon trade-offs during live LLM interactions. We study its use with undergraduate computer science students (N=89, ages 18-24), enrolled in a computing ethics course, providing an empirical look at how a technically sophisticated and values-oriented user population responds to sustainability-aware AI i
arXiv:2608.23817v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: SHAP and LIME are now standard tools for interpreting black-box predictions, yet their outputs can vary substantially when the input is perturbed by small amounts of noise--a problem we observed firsthand in our previous work on food security in Madagascar (Ralinirina et al., 2025). This variability raises the question of whether such explanations can be trusted at all. We address it by constructing an auditing protocol that measures two properties of any post-hoc explainer: robustness (how stable the explanation is under input perturbation) and fidelity (whether the features deemed important actually drive the model's prediction). These two quantities are combined into a single Trust Score. We run the protocol on a multi-sectoral dataset from Madagascar (83 features, 253 records, 4 malnutrition classes) using three classifiers and two explainers, plus their regularized counterparts. The results are sobering: models with AUC above 0.99
arXiv:2608.23705v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of generating text that challenges human performance in domains requiring creativity, yet evaluating creativity in LLM-generated content remains a significant challenge. Here, we investigate whether current automatic evaluation methods can reliably capture human judgments of creativity. We collect human evaluations of human- and AI-generated short stories from the WritingPrompts dataset across 11 dimensions of creativity, and compare these judgments with automated objective metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations. Our experiments reveal substantial misalignment between automatic evaluations and human assessments. In particular, LLM-based judges exhibit a systematic preference for AI-generated stories, consistently favoring their stylistic characteristics over the unpredictability and other qualities of human-authored texts. Furthermore, correlation analyses show that widely used autom
arXiv:2608.23640v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When a large language model (LLM) is asked to write a person's life, how much of what it writes actually happened? We present a scene-level case-study audit - the first quantified audit of LLM-generated autobiography against a subject-specific ground-truth corpus that we are aware of, based on an unsystematic literature search. The subject and the author of this paper are the same person: a 366-day "page-a-day" book of first-person anecdotal entries was drafted with a conversational LLM whose documented inputs were a template, two exemplar days, and each day's quote - not her corpus - and every day was subsequently audited at the anecdote-scene level against an independent verification corpus using a four-level rubric fixed before analysis. We define the verification-failure rate as the share of days not rated VERIFIED (scene positively corroborated): 354 of 366 days fail, 96.7% (Wilson 95% CI 94.4-98.1%). Only 12 days contain a corrobo
arXiv:2608.23617v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce adoption telemetry: a method for measuring enterprise AI adoption by computing change-management stage-progression directly from production usage signals. We contribute (1) a framework unifying pre-deployment evaluation gates, production telemetry, and change-management staging into one instrumented system; (2) NANTE, a concrete five-stage operationalization with defined telemetry thresholds, published openly so they can be tested and disproven; and (3) an open-source reference implementation that distinguishes a healthy cohort from five characteristic adoption-failure modes on synthetic populations with known ground truth. We are explicit that the thresholds are proposed constructs requiring empirical validation against real outcomes -- a research agenda we outline -- not a calibrated model.
arXiv:2608.24778v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cybersecurity education is facing more challenges as AI-driven attacks are becoming increasingly realistic and difficult to detect. Traditional video-based cybersecurity training in higher education often suffers from both low engagement and limited effectiveness. This dilemma motivates educators to explore innovative approaches, such as AI-powered gamification, which can deliver engaging, meaningful, and personalized learning experiences. By presenting content in a more interactive and user-friendly way, these methods have the potential to significantly improve both learner engagement and educational outcomes. This paper explores AI-powered gamification in cybersecurity education through the development of several short, mobile-friendly games. These games cover a range of topics from password security to text and phone scam recognition, incorporate multiple gamification strategies, including quiz-based, narrative-based, and simulation-ba
arXiv:2608.24761v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Healthcare organisations use digital systems to exchange information from clinical cases. Medical centres with digital production facilities create device designs during care. These designs and production records often remain at the site that made them. Other sites may struggle to find a suitable design or learn what happened when staff used it. Mobile medical centres may also lose access when they work away from hospital systems. This paper proposes an artifact-centred model for a federated exchange infrastructure that lets hospitals and mobile medical centres share and improve medical knowledge while controlling their own records and decisions. An integrative literature review screened 910 records and mapped 240 publications across six questions. We read 72 publications in detail to trace the path from local use to a decision about shared knowledge. The review found no common process that links a record of local use to a decision about
arXiv:2608.24748v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How can humans make sense of the rapid takeoff of artificial intelligence (AI)? We studied the sensemaking dynamics of AI through an open-ended, mixed-methods study with computational text analysis of millions of AI-related newspaper articles and social media posts grounded in 57 semi-structured interviews with AI professionals in 2021 and 2023--before and after the recent surge of public interest. We identify a range of sociological frames (interpretive schemas that structure collective cognition) and show how AI professionals use frames to address significant cognitive challenges, such as assigning responsibility for societal impacts. We develop a framework of three primary debates across which frames are adopted and contested: (i) the $\textit{method}$ of AI development, between frames of top-down expert systems and bottom-up emergent capabilities, (ii) the $\textit{mind}$ of an AI system, ranging from a passive tool to a humanlike "di
arXiv:2608.24562v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The automation of consequential decisions through opaque machine learning models in societal domains impedes our agency. This paper is about how agency can be reinstated by the provision of certain kinds of knowledge. More precisely, we discuss whether a specific type of explanation, counterfactual explanations, facilitates our ability to contest algorithmic decisions. Against this backdrop, our paper makes three contributions: First, we develop an account of contestability, where contestability is defined as the provision of information, sufficient for a decision-subject to use as a basis for demanding that a decision be revoked. We also demarcate contestability from adjacent concepts in the discourse surrounding the right to explanation, such as justification and recourse. Second, we examine to what extent counterfactual explanations are conducive to contestability by considering a variety of failure modes causing problematic algorithmi
arXiv:2608.24412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Against the background of the widespread use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the field of justice, this paper aims to explore how an AI solution designed to draft initial reports for reporting image-based sexual abuses (IBSA) could help, support, or assist in facilitating access to justice. In our approach, access to justice is facilitated not only by easing the path to denounce IBSA (which currently has the lowest reporting rate), but also by offering an early, and thus more accurate, report draft to law enforcement authorities, providing later support also for judges. Building upon earlier approaches, we designed an improved version and tested it with three experts. In this sense, the paper advocates for AI solutions offering effective and efficient support in early reporting of IBSA.
arXiv:2608.23999v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cities are beginning to use AI not only to analyze public space, but also to define what counts as evidence about it. This thesis asks what follows when scores, maps, and generated images become part of municipal decision-making. I argue that contemporary urbanism operates through two coupled infrastructures: the material city and an epistemic, algorithmic layer that shapes what cities can perceive, compare, and act upon. Because public space is contested, this algorithmic layer cannot be governed through technical performance alone. The thesis develops a civic Right to AI and a pluralistic approach to alignment in which differences in public values are made visible rather than averaged into a single objective. Methodologically, the thesis moves between normative theory, participatory research, machine learning, and governance design. The empirical work is grounded in Montr\'eal. Street Review combines participatory research with computer
arXiv:2608.23937v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: "AI psychosis" has entered public and clinical discourse as a label for the onset or exacerbation of psychotic symptoms, most commonly delusions, following intensive interaction with large language model (LLM)-based chatbots. Current evidence is limited to media reports, case reports, and early observational data, yet the scale of potential exposure is considerable, and public concern has prompted responses from industry and regulators. We examine whether AI-associated psychosis warrants recognition as a distinct clinical entity, drawing on clinical and technical viewpoints. We outline the proposed mechanism: LLM sycophancy, a tendency to agree with and flatter users that is reinforced through preference-based fine-tuning, combines with increasingly anthropomorphic design to create a bidirectional "echo chamber of one" capable of amplifying and co-constructing unusual beliefs. We then weigh arguments for and against nosological recognitio
arXiv:2608.23826v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many support applications are developed to help users living through intimate partner abuse (IPA). However, many of those projects get abandoned, because the application was a prototype that never got turned into an actual product, funding ran out, or the people maintaining it moved onto other projects. This abandonment can have devastating consequences because the users of these applications are vulnerable by definition. In this ongoing research, we aim to measure the abandonment of intimate partner abuse support applications. Our preliminary results with a dataset of 197 support tools indicate that 58.9\% of applications have lost support over time, either no longer receiving updates or not being available online at all.
arXiv:2608.23580v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agents of ViTAL: Ethics Missions is a browser-based, narrative-centered learning environment in which middle school students collaboratively evaluate whether a fictional school should adopt an AI-powered classroom feedback tool. Students investigate stakeholder perspectives, weigh tradeoffs across three AI ethics dimensions (privacy, bias, and environmental impact), and negotiate group consensus through a shared Ranking Challenge interface. The environment embeds EthicsBot, a conversational agent designed as a peer-like thought partner that scaffolds ethical reasoning and collaborative discussion. The project is being iteratively co-designed with high school students, whose feedback shapes EthicsBot's role, behavior, and guardrails. Initial classroom implementations with four ninth-grade classes demonstrated strong engagement and substantive ethical reasoning grounded in students' lived experiences with AI. The demo invites attendees to e